Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 227801
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T19:37:44+00:00 2026-05-11T19:37:44+00:00

I have some code like: good = [x for x in mylist if x

  • 0

I have some code like:

good = [x for x in mylist if x in goodvals]
bad = [x for x in mylist if x not in goodvals]

The goal is to split up the contents of mylist into two other lists, based on whether or not they meet a condition.

How can I do this more elegantly? Can I avoid doing two separate iterations over mylist? Can I improve performance by doing so?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T19:37:44+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 7:37 pm
    good = [x for x in mylist if x in goodvals]
    bad  = [x for x in mylist if x not in goodvals]
    

    is there a more elegant way to do this?

    That code is perfectly readable, and extremely clear!

    # files looks like: [ ('file1.jpg', 33L, '.jpg'), ('file2.avi', 999L, '.avi'), ... ]
    IMAGE_TYPES = ('.jpg','.jpeg','.gif','.bmp','.png')
    images = [f for f in files if f[2].lower() in IMAGE_TYPES]
    anims  = [f for f in files if f[2].lower() not in IMAGE_TYPES]
    

    Again, this is fine!

    There might be slight performance improvements using sets, but it’s a trivial difference, and I find the list comprehension far easier to read, and you don’t have to worry about the order being messed up, duplicates being removed as so on.

    In fact, I may go another step "backward", and just use a simple for loop:

    images, anims = [], []
    
    for f in files:
        if f.lower() in IMAGE_TYPES:
            images.append(f)
        else:
            anims.append(f)
    

    The a list-comprehension or using set() is fine until you need to add some other check or another bit of logic – say you want to remove all 0-byte jpeg’s, you just add something like..

    if f[1] == 0:
        continue
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 159k
  • Answers 159k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Generally this sort of thing is done by issue tracking… May 12, 2026 at 11:30 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Looks like they're using their own as there aren't any… May 12, 2026 at 11:30 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer A couple of ideas: Are you installing under the same… May 12, 2026 at 11:30 am

Related Questions

I've tentatively written this method: public static Func<T> WeakCacheFor<T>( Func<T> provider ) where T:
Is there a good method for writing C / C++ function headers with default
I have a data warehouse containing typical star schemas, and a whole bunch of
I have a warehouse. Sometimes I want to lookup a box location by a

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.