Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8495379
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 10, 20262026-06-10T23:33:28+00:00 2026-06-10T23:33:28+00:00

I have some code that has structure equivalent to this: import Debug.Trace newtype SomeExpensiveHiddenType

  • 0

I have some code that has structure equivalent to this:

import Debug.Trace

newtype SomeExpensiveHiddenType = SCHT Double

expensive :: Double -> Double -> SomeExpensiveHiddenType
expensive a b = SCHT $ trace "call expensive" (*) a b

cheap :: SomeExpensiveHiddenType -> Double -> Double
cheap (SCHT x) c = trace "call cheap" (+) x c

f1 :: Double -> Double -> Double -> Double
f1 a b c = let x = expensive a b in cheap x c

i.e. f1 is a function that computes an expensive result based upon the first two arguments, and then uses this with the third argument. I had hoped that a partial application on the the first 2 arguments, then repeated application of the 3rd argument would result in the expensive computation only being run once. Unfortunately this is not the case:

test1 = do
    putStrLn "test 1"
    let p = f1 2 3
    print (p 0.1)
    print (p 0.2)
    print (p 0.3)

results in:

*Main> test1
test 1
call cheap
call expensive
6.1
call cheap
call expensive
6.2
call cheap
call expensive
6.3
*Main> 

I’ve come up with what seems to be a solution:

newtype X a = X { unX :: a }
f2 :: Double -> Double -> X (Double -> Double)
f2 a b = let x = expensive a b in X (cheap x)

test2 = do
    putStrLn "test 2"
    let p = unX $ f2 2 3
    print (p 0.1)
    print (p 0.2)
    print (p 0.3)

resulting in:

*Main> test2
test 2
call cheap
call expensive
6.1
call cheap
6.2
call cheap
6.3
*Main> 

But this seems quite messy. Is there a cleaner way I can avoid the redundant calls to the expensive calc?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-10T23:33:29+00:00Added an answer on June 10, 2026 at 11:33 pm

    You can just put the third argument inside the let, so that x is shared.

    f2 a b = let x = expensive a b in \c -> cheap x c
    

    (In this case f2 a b = let x = expensive a b in cheap x works too.)


    What you are looking for is compiler-driven partial evaluation, and that is a hard problem… at least it is sufficiently hard to implement properly that it isn’t in GHC.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have some older (broken) code that has a join using a *= table1.ID
I have some code that creates some span tags and each span has its
I have a code that has some mpi api-dependent bits: #if MPIVERSION==1 ... #elif
We have a system that has some Bash scripts running besides Java code. Since
Suppose I have this database table (some sample code below) that stores the relationship
I have some code below. This code is a basic push/pop stack class that
I have some code that will change the background color of a specific label
I have some code that is supposed to return an NSString. Instead it is
I have some code that generates Visio masters for me, and some masters have
I have some code that causes the box2d physics simulation to stutter forever after

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.