Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6163783
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T21:52:57+00:00 2026-05-23T21:52:57+00:00

I have some functions which occasionally (not always) will receive a callback and run

  • 0

I have some functions which occasionally (not always) will receive a callback and run it. Is checking if the callback is defined/function a good style or is there a better way?

Example:

function save (callback){
   .....do stuff......
   if(typeof callback !== 'undefined'){
     callback();
   };
};
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T21:52:58+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 9:52 pm

    I personally prefer

    typeof callback === 'function' && callback();

    The typeof command is dodgy however and should only be used for "undefined" and "function"

    The problems with the typeof !== undefined is that the user might pass in a value that is defined and not a function

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have created a class say A which has some functions defined as protected.
I have some Perl modules which exports various functions. (We haven't used @EXPORT in
I have an ActiveX object which extends some functions. I have a web page
This is a Windows Forms application. I have a function which captures some mouse
I have a Python function in which I am doing some sanitisation of the
I have a PL/SQL function (running on Oracle 10g) in which I update some
I have some text which occasionally contains very long strings of characters, which is
I have some class which uses boost singleton. It calls some function from own
I have some question about functions which have default parameters. import sys from random
I have some code written by someone else in which some functions take arguments

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.