I have some generic types, like the following:
public struct Tuple<T1, T2> { ... } public struct Tuple<T1, T2, T3> { ... } etc.
These should in theory be able to compare themselves against other values of the same type, so that I can write the following type of code:
List<Tuple<Type, String>> l = new List<Tuple<Type, String>>(); l.Add(new Tuple<Type, String>(typeof(ISomeInterface), '123')); if (l.Contains(new Tuple<Type, String>(typeof(ISomeOtherInterface), '123')) ...
unfortunately, there was a bug in my code, and the question then becomes how to do this correctly.
The bug had to do with my implementation of CompareTo>, which basically looks like this:
Int32 result = HelperMethods.CompareTwoFields<T1>(_Value1, other._Value1); if (result != 0) return result; Int32 result = HelperMethods.CompareTwoFields<T2>(_Value2, other._Value2); if (result != 0) return result; return 0;
HelperMethods.CompareTwoFields looks like this:
internal static Int32 CompareTwoFields<T>(T field1, T field2) { Int32 result = 0; if (ReferenceEquals(field1, null) != ReferenceEquals(field2, null)) result = ReferenceEquals(field1, null) ? -1 : +1; else if (!ReferenceEquals(field1, null) && field1 is IComparable<T>) result = ((IComparable<T>)field1).CompareTo(field2); else if (!typeof(T).IsValueType) { if (Object.ReferenceEquals(field1, field2)) return 0; else return field1.ToString().CompareTo(field2.ToString()); } return result; }
The last if-statement there is something I tucked on now to fix the bug, but is this correct?
Basically, how do I compare two Type objects? Is there a meaningful comparison for these, except just to convert them to a string and compare?
Do you mean:
This works with
IEquatable<T>(forT : IEquatable<T>), else falls back toobject.Equals.There is also
Comparer<T>.Defaultfor inequality comparisons (greater/less):This uses
T : IComparable<T>, orT : IComparableotherwise.By the way,
Typeshould just use the regular reference compare provided byobject.Equals, so it should just work fine with the above.