Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6740227
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T11:34:51+00:00 2026-05-26T11:34:51+00:00

I have some methods in my class which are only meant to be used

  • 0

I have some methods in my class which are only meant to be used by other methods of the class. I’ve prefixed their names with ‘_’. Can I hide those functions from epydoc? Is it a good idea?

Should I use ‘_’ or double underscore? To be honest I didn’t get the difference after reading about them in some places. Should this naming convention be used only on module/class (instance) functions? Or also variables?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T11:34:52+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 11:34 am

    If you want to hide all private methods and private variables, pass option ‘–no-private’ to epydoc.

    Note that – for epydoc – a method or variable is private if:

    • its name starts with an underscore ‘_’ and
    • its name does not end with an underscore ‘_’ and
    • you did not include its name in the special all dictionary.

    Alternatively you can use the ‘undocumented’ tag to force epydoc to completely ignore certain methods or variables.

    For instance (and here I assume a ReStructured Text kind of formatting):

    class MyClass:
      """Some neat description
    
      :undocumented: x
      """
    
      def _y(self): pass
      def x(self): pass
      def z(self): pass
    

    will result in the documentation to contain only _y (unless you used the ‘–no-private’ option) and z. There will be nothing about x even if it is not private.

    Whether private methods should be visible at all or not in the final documentation is a matter of taste. To me, documentation is read by people who don’t or should not have any interest in the internal implementation. Private methods are best hidden completely.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a simple Java class that has some methods: public class Utils {
I have an abstract class with some methods,including an abstract method(Execute()).This method is overridden
I'm building a class library that will have some public & private methods. I
I have a class with some abstract methods, but I want to be able
I have a class library with some extension methods written in C# and an
I have a base class for many tests that has some helper methods they
is it possibly in c# to have some sort of base class functionality which
I have wrote a class (a snippet is below) which have some data members
can anyone give me some steps to create DLL without using class which means
I have a class with some method that depend by one parameter. What is

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.