Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6333811
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T18:32:06+00:00 2026-05-24T18:32:06+00:00

I have some methods that I don’t declare in my class’s interface because only

  • 0

I have some methods that I don’t declare in my class’s interface because only code within the class should use them. But the arrangement of my methods generates some “… might not respond to selector …” warnings when methods want to call methods that are implemented below them.

Is there any way I can declare prototypes for these pseudo-private methods in my implementation file so that I don’t get these warnings?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T18:32:08+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 6:32 pm

    You can use a class extension. I prefer them over categories (for this purpose) because the methods they declare must be implemented in the main @implementation block for the corresponding class.

    It is common for a class to have a publicly declared API and to then have additional methods declared privately for use solely by the class or the framework within which the class resides. You can declare such methods in a category (or in more than one category) in a private header file or implementation file as mentioned above. This works, but the compiler cannot verify that all declared methods are implemented.

    Class extensions allow you to declare additional required methods for a class in locations other than within the primary class @interface block

    You declare a class extension like this:

    @interface MyObject () // No name is given in the parentheses
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a interface that defines some methods with attributes. These attributes need to
I have an interface that defines some methods I would like certain classes to
I have some c3p0 pool encapsulated in a class that I use to execute
We have some methods that call File.Copy, File.Delete, File.Exists, etc. How can we test
I have some methods that are used by several classes. My idea was to
I have some WCF methods that are used to transmit information from a server
I have some Visual Basic methods that are acting as the click handlers for
I have some ASP.NET page and webservice WebMethod() methods that I'd like to add
I have some special parameters to all my wcf service methods that are handled
I have a background thread and the thread calls some methods that update the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.