Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 212391
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T18:10:57+00:00 2026-05-11T18:10:57+00:00

I have some (small amount) of data that I’ll need quick access to on

  • 0

I have some (small amount) of data that I’ll need quick access to on inital load, but not after that.

Right now, I have serialized the data (Generic List) to an Xml file and I’m deserializing it on load as needed.

My question is should I use the XmlSerializer or the BinaryFormatter? I’m not worried about file size, but serialization speed.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T18:10:57+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 6:10 pm

    BinaryFormatter is faster than XmlSerializer. It has to deal with much less bloated format without string parsing issues.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have WCF connector that should get some small amount of data for me,
I have some text on a page that is small but readable in Chrome/Safari
I have an expensive function that takes and returns a small amount of data
I have some vectors of experimental data that I need to massage, for example:
I have a program that listens on a port waiting for a small amount
I have a small (or perhaps not so small) issue with some ASP.NET/Castle Monorail
I have a some vector data that has been manually created, it is just
I have some small project to stream video to android device. Streaming is done
While doing some small regex task I came upon this problem. I have a
I am current making some small JS game in Netbeans and I have started

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.