Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6587389
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T16:54:39+00:00 2026-05-25T16:54:39+00:00

I have some vectors which represent color as a three element vector in the

  • 0

I have some vectors which represent color as a three element vector in the range [0-1]. Because of the way color works in opengl these values are in error if they are outside this range. I want to design a matrix or set of matrices that can smoothly transform a color inside this unit space, so I am starting off of an identity matrix and subtly altering it (which gives me the smoothly changing part). But inevitably the values start to fall outside this range. Are there some conditions I can verify about the transform matrix that will ensure that the iterated matrix will neither transform a vector above one or below zero?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T16:54:40+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 4:54 pm

    This one is a bit tricky.

    You’re trying to constrain your color vectors to the positive octant of a cube, centered on the origin. Here’s a sketch of the problem in 2-D:

    enter image description here

    A simple rotation matrix would quickly swing the (1,1) color vector out of the allowed “blue” zone. Not to mention that it could also push vectors out of the positive quadrant all together.

    So one idea would be transforming your cube-shaped space to a spherical one, doing the transformation there, and then back-transforming. This transformation is (obviously!) nonlinear. Some ideas on how to do this can be found here: blog post.

    Once you’re constraining to a sphere instead, things get a little simpler. Compute the eigenvalues of your transform matrix. Any values greater than one mean that the color vector can grow arbitrary large, so those matrices are out. All of them equal to one means that the vector magnitude will stay the same, regardless of how many times you compose the matrix. (Limited by numerical precision on your computer). All less than one means that your color vector will eventually collapse to (0,0).

    Now you still need to prevent any vector component from going negative. I think you can enforce this by having all eigenvalues be non-negative.

    So in summary, a positive definite matrix with an induced matrix norm of <= 1 should do the trick.

    But now that I’ve said all this…. this is probably not what you want to do since this pretty complex and computationally expensive. (“There must be a better way!”). I suggest posting a new question looking for the best technique, rather than trying to hack your given technique in to working. Still… this was a fun thought exercise.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have some numbers stored in a std::vector<int> . I want to find which
I have been struggling to think of some decent uses for things like vectors
I have some questions about vector in STL to clarify..... Where are the objects
I have some data structures: all_unordered_m is a big vector containing all the strings
I have a program that draws some vector graphics using System.Drawing and the Graphics
I have a class with a vector of pointers to objects. I've introduced some
I have some ASP.NET web services which all share a common helper class they
Here's an interesting question :) I have two vectors of matrices which I want
I have written some code in which a small part of the code takes
Given four binary vectors which represent classes: [1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0] [0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1] [0,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0] [0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0] What methods are

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.