Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4002042
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T07:58:41+00:00 2026-05-20T07:58:41+00:00

I have something like this in my Map public class Settings : ClassMap<Setting> {

  • 0

I have something like this in my Map

public class Settings : ClassMap<Setting>
{
  References(x => x.User).Not.Nullable();
}

Now every time I want to save a settings I have to give it a User Object otherwise I get

not-null property references a null or
transient value

My thinking was that by doing this I will enforce relational constraints. However it just seems weird that I have to pass in the whole object when really it needs to just use the Fk.

I hope it is not re-saving the whole thing internally and just adding the Fk to keep relational constraints.

So am I do this the right way?

Edit

 public class Settings : ClassMap<Setting>
 {
      Id(x => x.SettingId);
      Map(x => x.Something);
      Map(x => x.Something2);
      References(x => x.User).Not.Nullable();
 }


Public class User: ClassMap<User>
{
   Id(x => x.UserId);
   Map(x => x.FirstName);
   Map(x => x.LastName);
   HasOne(x => x.Settings);
   HasMany(x => x.AnotherTable);
}


Settings s = new Settings()
{
      Something = "142",
      Something2 = "1421414"
};

session.Create(s); // this will crash as s.User equals null;

I have to do this

User user = repo.GetUser("userId");

Settings s = new Settings()
{
      Something = "142",
      Something2 = "1421414",
      User = user
};

session.Create(s); // this should work.

Now I am wondering since I did User = user; Does nhibernate just grab the userId and save that into the Settings tbl or does it go through and check the user table for changes, and then checks the “another table” for changes?

Or does it do a blink update of all the fields for the user table and the another table.

Does that make sort of sense of what I mean by is it saving the whole object?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T07:58:41+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 7:58 am

    No, it won’t resave/update the user object. It will only get it’s Id and update the Fk Column. If you wan’t to know what is happening behind the scenes, you try using SQL Server Profiler (if your DB is MSSQL) or the NHibernate Profiler.

    By the way, check this ayende’s post, it tells about different ways of save/update/delete cascades in NHibernate.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Supposing to have something like this: #include <map> int main(){ std::map<int,int> m; m[1] =
I have something like this: <div class=content> <a href=#>A</a> </div> <div class=content> <a href=#>B</a>
It is typical to have something like this in your cshrc file for setting
In a bunch o' places in my code, I have something like this: public
i need a thread safe map, i have something like this: (i'm very new
I have something like this: barProgress.BeginAnimation(RangeBase.ValueProperty, new DoubleAnimation( barProgress.Value, dNextProgressValue, new Duration(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(dDuration))); Now, how
I have something like this: <node TEXT= txt A /> <node TEXT= txt X
So I have something like this: var xmlStatement:String = xmlObject.node[3].@thisValue; What mystery function do
In our code we used to have something like this: *(controller->bigstruct) = ( struct
Sounds like a weird question, but say I have something like this: $.post( /myajax.php,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.