Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 167493
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T12:17:06+00:00 2026-05-11T12:17:06+00:00

I have std::list<multimap<std::string,std::string>::iterator> > Now i have new element: multimap<std::string,std::string>::value_type aNewMmapValue(foo1,test) I want to

  • 0

I have

std::list<multimap<std::string,std::string>::iterator> > 

Now i have new element:

multimap<std::string,std::string>::value_type aNewMmapValue('foo1','test') 

I want to avoid the need to set temp multimap and do insert to the new element just to get its iterator back so i could to push it back to the:

std::list<multimap<std::string,std::string>::iterator> > 

can i somehow avoid this creation of the temp multimap. Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T12:17:06+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 12:17 pm

    You need to insert the key-value pair into a multimap before getting an iterator for it.

    An iterator does not work by itself. If you are storing iterators from several different multimaps you probably need to store more than just an iterator in the list.

    Perhaps:

    1. a pair<multimap<std::string,std::string>::iterator, multimap<std::string,std::string>::iterator> where first is the iterator and second is the end-iterator.

    2. a pair<multimap<std::string,std::string>::iterator, multimap<std::string,std::string>*> where first is the iterator, and second is a pointer to the multimap that the iterator belongs to.

    3. some other kind of solution.

    EDIT: I concur with Mykola Golubyev: It is often a bad idea to store iterators for a longer period of time, as the iterators may be invalidated.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 119k
  • Answers 119k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The core issue here is that direct field access is… May 11, 2026 at 11:46 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer $facebook->api_client->profile_setFBML is absolutely correct afair. Go to the App Page… May 11, 2026 at 11:46 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer While there are several choices of plugins for NetBeans or… May 11, 2026 at 11:46 pm

Related Questions

I have one std::list<> container and these threads: One writer thread which adds elements
I have a std::list of Points (that simply store an x, y). Each one
Last question for tonight, I promise. These pointers are giving me a serious headache.
I have a class Class which has a member std::list, I want to search

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.