Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1076425
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T21:25:17+00:00 2026-05-16T21:25:17+00:00

I have the code below: class A { }; class B: public virtual A

  • 0

I have the code below:

class A
{
};

class B: public virtual A
{
public:
    B()
    {
        cerr << "B()";
    }
    B(const A& a)
    {
        cerr << "B(const A&)";
    }
};

class C: public B
{

};

int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
    B *b = new B(C());
}

To my surprise B(const A& a) isn’t called. Why is that?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T21:25:17+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 9:25 pm

    B also has an implicitly declared copy constructor that is declared as

    B(const B&);
    

    This implicitly declared member function is called because it is a better match for the argument of type C than your user-declared constructor, B(const A&).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have the code below : public class Anything { public int Data {
I have the code below: // IBase.h #include <iostream> class IBase{ public: virtual string
I have a simple code below: import java.util.ArrayList; public class BoidList extends ArrayList {
I have a service with below code TaskService.svc [AspNetCompatibilityRequirements(RequirementsMode = AspNetCompatibilityRequirementsMode.Allowed)] public class TodoService
I have below code: class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { Task[] tasks
I have a class as below: public class Node { public int NodeID {
I have these classes: public class Product { [Key] public virtual int ProductId {
i have got below code which is working fine: public abstract class Beverage {
I have this code below. I need to use a class id instead of
Code below is working well as long as I have class ClassSameAssembly in same

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.