Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9208419
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 18, 20262026-06-18T00:36:52+00:00 2026-06-18T00:36:52+00:00

I have the follow sample code: type = ‘Foo’; test = { type: {

  • 0

I have the follow sample code:

type = 'Foo';

test = {
    type: {
        'fooVal': 'bar'
    }
}

alert(test.type.fooVal); // Bar
alert(test.Foo.fooVal); // TypeError: teste.Foo is undefined

How I can get the second alert to work?

I’ve tried:

test = {
    '"' + type + '"': {
        'fooVal': 'bar'
    }
}

But doesn’t work.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-18T00:36:53+00:00Added an answer on June 18, 2026 at 12:36 am

    Use bracket notation to do the assignment instead:

    type = 'Foo';
    test = {};
    test[type] = {fooVal: 'bar'};
    alert(test.Foo.fooVal);
    

    You can’t use variables as keys when assigning via object notation.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Hi I have got an ajax code as follows: $.ajax({ type:POST, url: 'sample.php', data:data=+data,
I have been trying to follow this example (download the source code from a
As the following code sample shows, person_list is a user-derived type and contains a
I have started using Simple-form and Bootstrap and I have tried to follow this
I have table of data that is sorted as follows: Item | Sample |
I have a simple class inheriting from WebControl as follow: public class Instrument :
I'm trying to follow http://www.foliotek.com/devblog/make-table-rows-sortable-using-jquery-ui-sortable/ And have created a very simple example http://jsfiddle.net/6wbZQ/ It's
I've been trying to follow this tutorial for deploying a WCF sample to IIS
I have a very simple code: char character; std::cin >> character; However, I would
I have simple JavaScript code that is using the Ajax API for fetching a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.