Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6654123
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T01:21:08+00:00 2026-05-26T01:21:08+00:00

I have the following basic object factory for when I want some members of

  • 0

I have the following basic object factory for when I want some members of a class hierarchy to have special construction code and any other members to have generic constructors.

My problem here is that TileFactory doesn’t have the method GetInstance–my program won’t compile if I try to call TileFactory.GetInstance(). Any advice?

 public static class ObjectFactory<K>
        {
            public static T GetInstance<T>() where T : K
            {
                T obj = (T)Activator.CreateInstance(typeof(T));
                return obj;
            }
//snip
            }

        }
//snip
        public static class TileFactory : ObjectFactory<Tile>
        {
        }
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T01:21:08+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 1:21 am

    Why can't I inherit static classes?

    Citation from here:

    This is actually by design. There seems to be no good reason to inherit a static class. It has public static members that you can always access via the class name itself. The only reasons I have seen for inheriting static stuff have been bad ones, such as saving a couple of characters of typing.

    There may be reason to consider mechanisms to bring static members directly into scope (and we will in fact consider this after the Orcas product cycle), but static class inheritance is not the way to go: It is the wrong mechanism to use, and works only for static members that happen to reside in a static class.

    (Mads Torgersen, C# Language PM)

    Other opinions from channel9

    Inheritance in .NET works only on instance base. Static methods are defined on the type level not on the instance level. That is why overriding doesn’t work with static methods/properties/events…

    Static methods are only held once in memory. There is no virtual table etc. that is created for them.

    If you invoke an instance method in .NET, you always give it the current instance. This is hidden by the .NET runtime, but it happens. Each instance method has as first argument a pointer (reference) to the object that the method is run on. This doesn’t happen with static methods (as they are defined on type level). How should the compiler decide to select the method to invoke?

    (littleguru)

    And as a valuable idea, littleguru has a partial “workaround” for this issue: the Singleton pattern.

    http://www.dofactory.com/Patterns/PatternSingleton.aspx

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have the following business object: public class MyObject { // Some public properties
currently i have jdbc code with the following basic stucture: get Connection (do the
I have following string String str = replace :) :) with some other string;
I have the following code in a class that is called from a web
I have the following basic code to read a text file from a StreamReader:
I have a basic question on destructors. Suppose I have the following class class
I have the following code to create a basic profile within my app, it
Say I have the following basic if-statement: if (A ~= 0) % do something
Probably a very basic beginner question. Imagine the following situation: I have an ASP.NET
I have the following code, which is the basis for pagination in a larger

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.