Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7719967
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T03:32:50+00:00 2026-06-01T03:32:50+00:00

I have the following bit of code, I expect that given cstdio is included

  • 0

I have the following bit of code, I expect that given cstdio is included that the first line will be printed, however the second line is printed.

What am I doing wrong? is it possible to know if labels such as printf or strncmp or memcpy have been defined in the current translation unit at compile time?

#include <iostream>
#include <cstdio>

int main()
{
   #ifdef printf
      std::cout << "printf is defined.\n";
   #else
      std::cout << "printf NOT defined!\n";
   #endif
   return 0;
}

Is the reason because the preprocessor is run before variables and labels are introduced into the scope/TU?

In short is the following code bogus? :

http://code.google.com/p/cmockery/source/browse/trunk/src/example/calculator.c#35

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T03:32:51+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 3:32 am

    #ifdef only applies to preprocessor macros, defined with #define, not to symbols like function names and variables. You can imagine the preprocessor as an actual separate preliminary step, like running your code through a perl script, that occurs before the “real” compiler gets a crack at it.

    So there is no programmatic way to check whether symbols like printf are defined in the current scope. If you use one and it’s not defined, you’ll get a compiler error. The normal thing to do is to #include a header file with the required definition in the source file where you reference it, not to write a source file that will adapt itself to different possible sets of headers.

    As a hack, and depending on your environment and specific problem, the header file that does define printf (or whatever function you care about) may also contain some preprocessor #defines that you could check for.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have the following bit of code in my htaccess that will allow a
I have the following bit of code that worked as expected before we upgraded
I have the following bit of legacy C++ code that does not compile: #include
How do I change the following bit of code so that I only have
I have the following bit of code that modifies an observable collection of 'screens'
I have the following simple bit of code that is crashing and it's not
I have the following bit of code that reads data from the an Oracle
I have the following bit of code that I am having some difficulty with.
I have the following bit of code in a method called by clicking the
I have the following bit of code: protected function onEnterFrame(e:Event):void { var diff:Number; //

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.