Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 908705
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T16:45:33+00:00 2026-05-15T16:45:33+00:00

I have the following code: #include <stdlib.h> #include <stdio.h> #define SIZE 100 int* arr;

  • 0

I have the following code:

#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>

#define SIZE 100

int* arr;

main()
{
    int i;

    arr = (int*)malloc(SIZE*sizeof(int));

    if (arr == NULL) {
        printf("Could not allocate SIZE(=%d)", SIZE);
    }

    for (i=0; i<SIZE; i++) {
        arr[i] = 0;
    }

    free(arr);
}

I wan’t to watch for arr[10] and see when that array element is being modified.

How can I do this? gdb says the following:

$ gcc -g main.c
$ gdb a.out
...
(gdb) watch arr[10]
Cannot access memory at address 0x28

Is there a way to tell gdb to watch an invalid memory and stop only when it becomes valid?

PS: I have gdb versions 6.0, 6.3, 6.4, 6.6, 6.8, 7.0 and 7.1

Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T16:45:34+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 4:45 pm

    For some reason, I was using gdb-6.3 (it was in my PATH and I didn’t notice it). But, when I tried with gdb-7.1 it worked!

    Since gdb 7.0 you can watch memory that isn’t yours at the moment.

    With the following source code:

    #include <stdlib.h>
    #include <stdio.h>
    
    #define SIZE 100
    
    int* arr;
    
    main()
    {
        int i;
    
        arr = (int*)malloc(SIZE*sizeof(int));
    
        if (arr == NULL) {
            printf("Could not allocate SIZE(=%d)", SIZE);
        }
    
        for (i=0; i<SIZE; i++) {
            arr[i] = i; /* So it changes from malloc */
        }
    
        free(arr);
    }
    

    You can compile with:

    $ gcc -g -o debug main.c
    

    And then debug with:

    $ gdb debug
    GNU gdb (GDB) 7.1
    ...
    (gdb) watch arr[10]
    Watchpoint 1: arr[10]
    (gdb) run
    Starting program: /remote/cats/gastonj/sandbox/debug/debug
    Hardware watchpoint 1: arr[10]
    
    Old value = <unreadable>
    New value = 0
    main () at main.c:14
    14          if (arr == NULL) {
    (gdb) cont
    Continuing.
    Hardware watchpoint 1: arr[10]
    
    Old value = 0
    New value = 10
    main () at main.c:18
    18          for (i=0; i<SIZE; i++) {
    (gdb) cont
    Continuing.
    
    Program exited with code 01.
    (gdb)
    

    Hope it helps for somebody else.

    NOTE: I tried adding this as a comment in the post by Neil, but as it wasn’t formatted, I preferred writing an answer to my question.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 471k
  • Answers 471k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer There really isn't a single color that matches a paperback… May 16, 2026 at 3:20 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer One option is to chain the -replace operations together. The… May 16, 2026 at 3:20 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer public static <T extends Matchable<T>> T findMatch(T toMatch, T[] toSearch)… May 16, 2026 at 3:20 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.