Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3300812
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T20:41:42+00:00 2026-05-17T20:41:42+00:00

I have the following code which works as expected: #include <iostream> using namespace std;

  • 0

I have the following code which works as expected:

#include <iostream>

using namespace std;

typedef int (TMyFunc)(int);

TMyFunc* p;

int x(int y)
{
    return y*2;
}

int main()
{
    p = &x;
    cout << (*p)(5) << endl;
}

What I want to do is skip defining x and define p there straight. Something like

TMyFunc p; p(y){return y*2;}.

Is that possible? If so how do I do it? If not why?

EDIT:

After seeing the answers, I think I should clarify: I want the definition to be separate. i.e. function definition will be in a shared object. An application will acquire a function pointer to the function via dlsym. I do not want a function object. What I want is to know if I can define a function using its type which a header file common to both the shared object and the application will provide. I hope that came out right :).

EDIT2: For sbi 🙂

This resides in a header which is included in both the application and the shared object:

#define FNAME_GET_FACTORY       "GetFactory"
#define FNAME_GET_FUNCTION_IDS  "GetFunctionIDs"
#define FNAME_GET_PLUGIN_INFO   "GetPluginInfo"

typedef FunctionFactory* (*TpfGetFactory)();
typedef size_t (*TpfGetFunctionIDs)(int**);
typedef PluginInfo* (*TpfGetPluginInfo)();

In the application, something like this happens:

TpfGetFactory pF = (TpfGetFactory)dlsym(pHandle, FNAME_GET_FACTORY);
//Use pF for anything

Now, to do this, I have to define GetFactory as follows in the shared object:

extern "C" FunctionFactory* FNAME_GET_FACTORY(){//CODE}

Forgetting the extern "C" part for now, Can I define this function using the type TpfGetFactory which is already defined? (This is not a huge issue I know – but I am curious as to whether it is possible 🙂 ). What I want is something like this in the shared object :

TpfGetFactory f;
f(){//Implementation}

EDIT3:

My try:

#include <iostream>

using namespace std;

typedef int (TF)(int);

TF f;

f(int x)
{
    return x*2;
}

int main()
{
    x(3);
}

main.cpp:9: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of ‘f’ with no type
main.cpp: In function ‘int main()’:
main.cpp:16: error: ‘x’ was not declared in this scope
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T20:41:42+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 8:41 pm

    It’s possible in C++1x, the next C++ standard, generally expected next year (which would make it C++11, then). It allows this:

    auto p = [](int y){return y*2;};
    

    This relies on auto been given a new meaning (“automatically deduce the type of this variable from the expression that initializes it”) and the new lambda functions (allowing to create functions on the fly).

    Your compiler might actually already support this.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.