Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 787269
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T21:10:30+00:00 2026-05-14T21:10:30+00:00

I have the following ( doctored ) class in a system I’m working on

  • 0

I have the following (doctored) class in a system I’m working on and Findbugs is generating a SE_BAD_FIELD warning and I’m trying to understand why it would say that before I fix it in the way that I thought I would. The reason I’m confused is because the description would seem to indicate that I had used no other non-serializable instance fields in the class but bar.model.Foo is also not serializable and used in the exact same way (as far as I can tell) but Findbugs generates no warning for it.

import bar.model.Foo;

import java.io.File;
import java.io.Serializable;
import java.util.List;

import org.slf4j.Logger;
import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;

public class Demo implements Serializable {

    private final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(this.getClass());
    private final File file;
    private final List<Foo> originalFoos;
    private Integer count;
    private int primitive = 0;

    public Demo() {
        for (Foo foo : originalFoos) {
            this.logger.debug(...);
        }
    }

    ...

}

My initial blush at a solution is to get a logger reference from the factory right as I use it:

public DispositionFile() {
    Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(this.getClass());
    for (Foo foo : originalFoos) {
        this.logger.debug(...);
    }
}

That doesn’t seem particularly efficient, though.

Thoughts?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T21:10:31+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 9:10 pm

    Firstly, don’t optimize prematurely. It may be that LoggerFactory.getLogger() is fast enough, and contributes no significant overhead to execution time. If in doubt, profile it.

    Secondly, the reason that findbugs isn’t complaining about the use of Foo is because the class doesn’t have a field of type Foo, it has a field of type List. The generics are erased at compile time, there is no actual reference to Foo in the class, as far as the field definition is concerned. At runtime, the fact that Foo is non-serializable would cause an exception if you tried to serialize an instance of the Demo class, but findbugs can’t know this.

    My first reaction would be to make the Logger a static field, rather than an instance field. Should work fine in this situation.

    public class Demo implements Serializable {
       private static final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(Demo.class);
    
       // .. other stuff
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have following 2 class class CallNetworkMethod extends AsyncTask<Void, Void, Void> { @Override protected
I have following code: class EntityBase (object) : __entity__ = None def __init__ (self)
I Have following in my struts.xml file <action name=ProductVerification class=com.frontend.ProductVerification> <result name=success>/jsp/product_verification.jsp</result> <result name=input>/jsp/product_verification.jsp</result>
I have following code: public class GameCanvas extends JPanel { private GridField[][] grid; private
I have following code: class A : public QObject { Q_OBJECT public: A() :
I have following Association; class Package < ActiveRecord::Base has_many : modules end class Module
I have following mapping definitions: <class name=Role table=Role optimistic-lock=version > <id name=Id type=Int32 unsaved-value=0
I have following design requirements: interface Server {} public class ServerImpl implements Server {}
I have following elements in the page: <div class=cl1 cl2></div> <div class=cl1 cl2></div> <div
I have following XsL which opens the link in the same window. I would

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.