Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 311365
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T07:55:05+00:00 2026-05-12T07:55:05+00:00

I have the following function to get validation errors for a card. My question

  • 0

I have the following function to get validation errors for a card. My question relates to dealing with GetErrors. Both methods have the same return type IEnumerable<ErrorInfo>.

private static IEnumerable<ErrorInfo> GetErrors(Card card)
{
    var errors = GetMoreErrors(card);
    foreach (var e in errors)
        yield return e;
    
    // further yield returns for more validation errors
}

Is it possible to return all the errors in GetMoreErrors without having to enumerate through them?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T07:55:06+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 7:55 am

    It is something that F# supports with yield! for a whole collection vs yield for a single item. (That can be very useful in terms of tail recursion…)

    Unfortunately it’s not supported in C#.

    However, if you have several methods each returning an IEnumerable<ErrorInfo>, you can use Enumerable.Concat to make your code simpler:

    private static IEnumerable<ErrorInfo> GetErrors(Card card)
    {
        return GetMoreErrors(card).Concat(GetOtherErrors())
                                  .Concat(GetValidationErrors())
                                  .Concat(AnyMoreErrors())
                                  .Concat(ICantBelieveHowManyErrorsYouHave());
    }
    

    There’s one very important difference between the two implementations though: this one will call all of the methods immediately, even though it will only use the returned iterators one at a time. Your existing code will wait until it’s looped through everything in GetMoreErrors() before it even asks about the next errors.

    Usually this isn’t important, but it’s worth understanding what’s going to happen when.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 225k
  • Answers 225k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer There is no such thing; transparency is done via another… May 13, 2026 at 12:59 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Transparent only affects drawing, not mouse events. The check box… May 13, 2026 at 12:59 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Development environments do not require you to restart the server… May 13, 2026 at 12:59 am

Related Questions

I've got the following installed through MacPorts on MacOS X 10.5.6: py25-sqlite3 @2.5.4_0 (active)
A ValidationSummary will show a list of errors on postback. As each field is
I'm trying to write a custom method to validate a date. The date however
I have only recently started web programming and I am pretty much amazed that

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.