Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6561029
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T13:32:14+00:00 2026-05-25T13:32:14+00:00

I have the following situation: class Foo { public: static const Foo memberOfFoo; ……..

  • 0

I have the following situation:

class Foo
{
public:
  static const Foo memberOfFoo;

  ........
}

So the thing is I can’t initialize it in the same line where I declared it, and, I can’t initialize it via Initializations List in the constructor, does anyone know what to do?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T13:32:15+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 1:32 pm

    Put this outside of the class definition then:

    const Foo Foo::memberOfFoo = whateverValue;
    

    That is the definition of Foo::memberOfFoo, which can supply an initializer and has to go into the .cpp file (like any other definition of objects, it can only appear once in the whole program, otherwise you will get linker errors).

    Sometimes you will find code that doesn’t have definitions for its static data members:

    struct A {
      // sometimes, code won't have an "const int A::x;" anywhere!
      static const int x = 42;
    };
    

    Omitting the definition like that is valid only if A::x is never address-taken and never passed to reference parameters. A more formal way to say when it is valid to omit the definition is: “When all uses of A::x immediately read the stored value of A::x”. That’s the case for many static integer constants.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Suppose I have the following situation: 9 class Program 10 { 11 public static
I have the following situation: class A { public: A(int whichFoo); int foo1(); int
Suppose you have the following situation #include <iostream> class Animal { public: virtual void
Imagine I have the following situation: Test1.java import java.lang.ref.WeakReference; public class Test1 { public
I have the following situation: typedef void (*F_POINTER)(ClassName*); class ClassName { public: F_POINTER f;
I have a problem with JPA 1.0 (OpenJPA) Following situation @Entity public class A{
I have following situation class base { public: virtual void Accepted(SOCKET s) //// Event
I have the following situation: class Worker { public Integer somework() { Integer k=0;
I have the following situation : abstract class X { abstract X someMethod (...)
I have following situation. In a constructor of a pseudo class I attach a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.