Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I have the following situation.
We want an reputation table to evaluate Users And Companies.
This reputation table would store the reputation given by an Company to User and vice-versa.
It was suggested that we should create two reputation tables, one for the Users and another for the Companies, both with the same columns.
I dont think thats the best way but I cant find another solution.
Is there any other way we could do that?
thx
You would have a table for the company containing a unique key for that Co. Same for the user.
I assume the relationship between Co and User is many-to-many.
You need one more table containing both keys, for Co and User, and two fields, one for Co-rep and one for User-rep. The Co-key and User-key combination would be unique entries for this table.