I have the need to create the functionality to allow my registered users to associate themselves with other uses and create a family. My database tables look something like this:
db.persons – (Bob, Jane, Timmy, etc)
- id
- name
db.persons_persons
- id
- person__id_parent
- person_id_child
- relationtype_id
db.relationtypes – (spouse, child, nephew, etc)
- id
- name
With this structure, I should be able to specify that Bob is a Spouse of Jane in the persons_persons table. The record in db.persons_persons would look something like (psuedo):
ID | person_parent | person_child | relationtype 1 | Bob | Jane | Spouse 2 | Bob | Timmy | Child
I realize this could cause some data fragmentation since if Bob and Jane are married, then a child of one would have to be associated with the other. However that is not my question. My question is whether or not this database setup is ‘most-correct’ for use in a cakePHP application.
Firstly, CakePHP will automatigally inflect a
peopletable into apeoplecontroller and apersonmodel, so you don’t need to call itpersons. Then I’d call the lookup tablerelationshipsrather thanpersons_persons.I’d call the fields in your relationships table
person_id,relation_idandrelation_type_id, and then add an underscore in yourrelationtypestable name so it becomesrelation_types.I think this is more semantic.
You could still use a hasAndBelongsToMany association, and make use of the automagic ‘with‘ associations offered by CakePHP (1.2 only) to access the additional data in the HABTM table for relation type.
However, I’d be tempted to use:
PersonhasManyRelationRelationbelongsToPerson,Relation,RelationTypeIn your app, is a persons relationship implied by someone else’s relationship to them? I.e. if you find Person.id = 1 you might get all their relations, e.g. Person.id 2, 3 and 4. But if you find Person.id 2, you would not automatically get Person.id = 1, unless there was another record in the relations table that represented that relationship.
To achieve this, you can set up another assocation:
PersonhasManyRelation1with foreignKeyperson_idPersonhasManyRelation2with foreignKeyrelation_idRelationbelongsToPerson,Relation,RelationTypeNote, you can achieve this dual relationship with HABTM too.