Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6836609
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T23:22:33+00:00 2026-05-26T23:22:33+00:00

I have the same problem as described here : I am using two orchestrations.

  • 0

I have the same problem as described here:

I am using two orchestrations. First orchestration calls the second using direct binding through a two-way send port. Second orchestrion has a two-way receive port to send the result back to the first. Every thing is working as it should but I am getting the following exception.

A response message for two-way receive port "Unknown " is being suspended as the messaging engine could not correlate the response to an existing request message. This usually happens when the host process has been recycled.

And the suggested solution works as well (set the BTS.EpmRRCorrelationToken value to a random value, new GUID in my case, in the first orchestration before send to the direct binding port and then in the secod orchestration i copy the value from the inputMessage to the outputMessage, so the value remains the same. With this method BizTalk knows how to correlate the response back to the caller). But I can’t understand why this works and if this a good way to solve the problem. The BTS.EpmRRCorrelationToken flow is the following:
UML

When I don’t change the BTS.EpmRRCorrelationToken property, it is the same in all messages which flow in the process, but why on Earth doesn’t BizTalk change it instead if it can’t correctly correlate the messages?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T23:22:34+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 11:22 pm

    Changing this property is certanly OK in your case.

    The problem is direct binding. When you use it, you actually going more “low-level” way and have to deal with how BTS publish-subscribe mechanism works.

    Send-Receive port subscribes to receive a message with a specific BTS.EpmRRCorrelationToken. So when you post receive message again in the Message box (for second orch), receive port grabs it too and unsubscribes then. When you finally try to send a response – there is noone waiting for it. So you have to change that property until you sending response back to the port.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have the same question problem as described here How to purge a cached
I have the same problem as described in the posts listed below. That is,
I have the same problem as described in ( Last record of Join table
I have essentially the same problem discussed here: http://khason.net/blog/dependency-property-getters-and-setters-in-multithreaded-environment/ public static readonly DependencyProperty MyPropertyProperty
I have basically the same problem outlined in this question, however I am using
I actually have two questions regarding the same problem but I think it is
I have the same problem outlined here . That is, nested view models in
I have the same problem as in the following post . So I am
Solution: if you have the same problem, addElement() instead of addChild() is what did
Does anyone have the same problem as I do? ... I've upgraded to the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.