Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 942609
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T22:18:01+00:00 2026-05-15T22:18:01+00:00

I have the strange aversion to passing in multiple ID parameters to a single

  • 0

I have the strange aversion to passing in multiple ID parameters to a single stored procedure. For example, this feels just wrong:

GetMyObject(ListofIDs, OtherParam1, OtherParam2, …)

I understand HOW to do it (correctly if I must).. but I don’t feel like I should do it. I feel like it defeats the purpose of a “get item” stored procedure/sub routine. I feel like I should build my SPs to support appropriate filter parameters. If my caller has a list of IDs, shouldn’t they call the sp that many times?

Help?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T22:18:02+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 10:18 pm

    A “get item by ID” routine should never return more than one object, because that makes absolutely no linguistic sense.

    A “get items by IDs” routine? Sure, if you have a decent use-case for it and it’ll be used often enough.

    But most of the time, yes, instead of a routine returning multiple items by ID, you want a routine that returns items based on application-appropriate filtering parameters (e.g. “give me all transactions from January 8th for more than $10”).

    By the way, sometimes a range of IDs (e.g. everything between 5 and 10) is a perfectly valid set of filters!

    Incidentally, this isn’t necessarily just a MySQL or SQL-in-general issue. Almost any sort of dataset querying API in any language will present these same design questions, and their answers will usually be highly similar.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a strange, sporadic issue. I have stored procedure that returns back 5
I have this strange call stack and I am stumped to understand why. It
I have this strange issue with my web app. You see, I'm using jQuery
I have strange problem with sharepoint and ajax functionality. We have an UpdatePanel placed
I have a strange requirement to ship an application without bundling .Net framework (to
I have a strange issue: I am using SPContext.Current.Web in a .aspx page, but
We have very strange problem, one of our applications is continually querying server by
I have a strange phenomenon while continuously instantiating a com-wrapper and then letting the
I have a strange problem with mod_rewrite, the rules that are relevant here are:
I have a strange problem with VS2008. My solution has 8 projects (all c#)

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.