Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6932663
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T11:44:03+00:00 2026-05-27T11:44:03+00:00

I have this class: public class MyClass { [Column(Name=StoredColumn, DbType=int)] public int Stored; public

  • 0

I have this class:

public class MyClass {
    [Column(Name="StoredColumn", DbType="int")]
    public int Stored;

    public int ForDisplay {
       get { return Stored * 1000; }
    }
}

The point is ForDisplay is not to be stored in the database – I just need it for more convenient code.

I try to run an SQL query that returns a rowset and get this InvalidOperationException:

Cannot assign value to member ‘ForDisplay ‘. It does not define a setter.

I don’t want ForDisplay to be touched by Linq-To-Sql. How do tell Ling-To-Sql to not touch it?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T11:44:04+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 11:44 am

    You don’t need to tell Linq to Sql that it should not touch the “ForDisplay” property. Normally, all properties that are not specifically marked with the Column attribute are treated as transient part of your application logic and are not persisted or retrieved from the database.

    However, if you want to retrieve some records from the database via a stored procedure, say GetMyClasses, then the designer will create a new class GetMyClassesResult. If you look at the generated code, then you will notice that the class is not decorated with the Table attribute. In that case the mapper assumes that every property must be assigned. If there is a property without corresponding value in the query then the mapper will try to set the property to default(T), but as there is no setter, the exception will be thrown.

    Anyway, to make a long story short, just adding

    [Table]
    public class MyClass
    {
      ...
    }
    

    to your class should fix the issue.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Say I have this class: class myclass { public int Field1{ get; set; }
I have a class like this: class MyClass{ public: MyClass(int Mode); private: std::map <
Say I have a class like this: public class MyClass { public string Name;
Let's say, I have this class public class MyClass { public int MyMethod(int? i)
Given this class: public class MyClass { public int MyProperty {get; set;} } How
I have this class: public MyClass { public void initialize(Collection<String> data) { this.data =
I have a class like this: public class myClass { public List<myOtherClass> anewlist =
Currently I have a class that looks like this: public class MyClass : IMyClass
I have a List<MyClass> The class is like this: private class MyClass { public
I have a class with two constructors that look like this: public MyClass(SomeOtherClass source)

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.