Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 320853
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T08:47:30+00:00 2026-05-12T08:47:30+00:00

I have this combo bound to a linq table. Is there a lightweight way

  • 0

I have this combo bound to a linq table.
Is there a lightweight way to update the UI (combo values that are displayed to the user) when I insert a new record in the linq table?

Basically from what I understand I should have used an ObservableCollection, but I don’t want to copy the data back & forth from the linq table to that collection, I only want to have data in the linq table.

Is that possible?

EDIT

OK Here is what i have done (and still it doesn’t work):

    private ObservableCollection<Categories> m_Categories;
    private ObservableCollection<Categories> Categories
    {
        get
        {
            return m_Categories;
        }
    }

in the XAML i have:

                 <ComboBox Name="cmbCategory" 
                           ItemsSource="{Binding Categories}"
                           DisplayMemberPath="Name"
                           SelectedValuePath="Id"
                           />

So, pretty simple.

       //if i have a new category, i want to update the combo's content
        if (frmEditCategory.ShowDialog() == true)
        {
            //get the new category and add it to the ObservableCollection
            LibraryDataStore.Instance.Categories.ToList().ForEach(p => 
            {
                if (!m_Categories.Contains(p))
                {
                    m_Categories.Add(p);
                }
            });

            //update the target? is this correct?!
            BindingExpression be = cmbCategory.GetBindingExpression(ComboBox.ItemsSourceProperty);
            if (be != null)
                be.UpdateTarget();     
        }

Checked with the debugger, m_Categories contains the new category, but it doesn’t show up in the combo.

Also, do you know any good tutorial or blog post about combo binding?…

Thank you in advance

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T08:47:31+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 8:47 am

    What you are asking for is not possible. You need a mediator of some sort, and you have already identified the correct one- ObservableCollection. You have to move the Linq data somewhere if you want your user interface to be notified when it changes. You should have one ObservableCollection, which you add your Linq data to, and then you should bind the combo-box to the ObservableCollection rather than directly to the table. That is the simplest, most light-weight solution you can create and still receive automatic change notifications.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have this code in jQuery, that I want to reimplement with the prototype
I have this RewriteRule that works too well :-) RewriteRule ^([^/]*)/$ /script.html?id=$1 [L] The
I have this line in a useful Bash script that I haven't managed to
I have this idea for a free backup application. The largest problem I need
I have this gigantic ugly string: J0000000: Transaction A0001401 started on 8/22/2008 9:49:29 AM
I have this line in a javascript block in a page: res = foo('<%=
I have this setup where in my development copy I can commit changes on
I have this string 'john smith~123 Street~Apt 4~New York~NY~12345' Using JavaScript, what is the
I have this method on a webpart: private IFilterData _filterData = null; [ConnectionConsumer(Filter Data
I have this strange call stack and I am stumped to understand why. It

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.