Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4053360
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T14:26:14+00:00 2026-05-20T14:26:14+00:00

I have this condition: If (cmbStatusSearch.SelectedValue <> -1) Then How can I make it

  • 0

I have this condition:

 If (cmbStatusSearch.SelectedValue <> "-1") Then

How can I make it better in performance? I read String.CompareOrdinal is faster in comparing strings. So should I use:

 If (String.CompareOrdinal(cmbStatusSearch.SelectedValue,"-1" <>0) Then

Or is there any other way to make if faster in performance?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T14:26:14+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 2:26 pm

    I think you’re being overly concerned about the wrong type of performance issues and prematurely optimizing a trivial piece of code.

    The first example is much more readable than the second. If it serves your purpose then move on and be content with it. Your performance bottleneck will not be in that statement. If you feel some operation in your program is slow then use a profiler, such as the ANTS Performance Profiler (or similar), to discover where the bottleneck is. Until then, guessing about performance issues is futile.

    To put this into perspective, consider that no one would use LINQ if they were so concerned over performance to the level presented in your question. Instead, they would stick to traditional code and for loops, which are known to be faster. However, for the sake of readability and expressiveness, LINQ is commonly used and acceptable.

    Although String.CompareOrdinal might be more efficient, I would recommend using it when you need to benefit from its intended purpose, which is to perform a case-sensitive comparison using ordinal sort rules. Otherwise, for your posted example, a direct comparison is fine and more readable.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have this Erlang code: not lists:any(fun(Condition) ->Condition(Message) end, Conditions). Can anyone please explain
Suppose I have this code: (handler-case (read ...) (parse-error (condition) (format t What text
My $condition in find() cannot make use of virtualfield. I have this virtualfield on
I have managed to put this condition and rule below together to redirect a
I have ran across a few queries that use this where condition: select ...
Say, you have a condition like this; if ($condition_1 && $condition_2) and you have
I have code that all over the place(probably 20-30 instances) does this: <widget>.setVisible((condition ==
I have this msbuild target in my csproj file: <Target Name=AfterBuild Condition= '$(Configuration)' ==
I have this if condition, if (sendSMS(Convert.ToInt32(DLComportNo.SelectedItem.Text), TxtDriMob.Text, TxtCliDet.Text) && sendSMS(Convert.ToInt32(DLComportNo.SelectedItem.Text), TxtCliMob.Text, TxtDriDet.Text)) {
I have this find condition pulling from my model that currently looks like this.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.