Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6580133
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T15:59:17+00:00 2026-05-25T15:59:17+00:00

I have this scenario, which I think must be pretty common: class Parameter {

  • 0

I have this scenario, which I think must be pretty common:

class Parameter
{
  public int someInt;
  private decimal someDecimal;
  public SubParameter subParameter;
}

class SubParameter
{
  public string someString { get; set; }
}

I have a breakpoint at a call to a method that takes a Parameter as a parameter. I want to write a unit test where I call this method with the same exact value (a copy of the Parameter object “tree”).
It is very tedious in this case to write the many lines declaring and initializing all the fields and properties of the class, which themselves might be non-primitive etc.
It would be nice if I could just right-click on the parameter variable and then have code auto-generated to create such an object.

So if at my breakpoint, my Parameter object has the value

Parameter parameter = new Parameter
  {
    someInt = 42, 
    someDecimal = 42.42m, 
    subParameter = new SubParameter { someString = "42" }
  };

well, then that code would be generated. I could then use the generated code for my unit test.

Does such a thing exist?


Edit:

I guess I have been unclear. I know perfectly well how to write the code myself by hand.

What I want is that when I am hitting a breakpoint and watching a complex variable (or any variable for that matter), I want to be able to say: Generate code for me that creates a clone of this variable. I would use the generated code for my unit test.

Does such a tool exist?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T15:59:18+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 3:59 pm

    Just create a helper method to create the parameter for you:

    public void CreateParameter()
    {
        return new Parameter
        {
            someInt = 42, 
            someDecimal = 42.42m, 
            subParameter = new SubParameter { someString = "42" }
        };
    }
    

    Sample use

    [TestMethod]
    public void MyTest()
    {
        SomeClass.MethodBeingTested(CreateParameter());
    }
    

    If you want to have a specific parameter value then modify the returned parameter or provide an overload which allows you to supply that value:

    [TestMethod]
    public void MyTest()
    {
        Parameter parameter = CreateParameter();
        parameter.someInt = 23;
        SomeClass.MethodBeingTested(parameter);
    }
    

    I usually have my CreateParameter populate the parameter with random values to reduce the possibility that the unit test happens to pass “by chance” for certain values, but will fail for others.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a similar scenario as this one: public class TestLinq2Xml { private XElement
we have this scenario: A server which contains needed data and client component which
The scenario is this We have two applications A and B, both which are
I have a scenario which I think I can convey giving PC Monitor example
I have this scenario where I need data integrity in the physical database. For
I have this typical scenario. I have a smartclient application built on .net 2.0
This is a question for a WSS/SharePoint guru. Consider this scenario: I have an
Scenario: I have a document I created using LaTeX (my resume in this case),
Much related to this question , we have a scenario on my team where
In this simplified scenario, I have a model called Post Each post has a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.