Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7052823
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T03:25:48+00:00 2026-05-28T03:25:48+00:00

I have this statement about java equals and hashcode. if we were to use

  • 0

I have this statement about java equals and hashcode.

if we were to use such an Integer object for a key in a HashMap, we would not be able to reliably retrieve the associated value

what it means ? why it says ‘not reliably’ ? I write a test program, it always works.

public class Test1 {

    public static void main(String[] args){
        Map<Integer, Student> map = new HashMap<Integer, Student>();

        map.put(1, new Student("john"));        
        map.put(2, new Student("peter"));

        Student s1 = map.get(1);
        Student s2 = map.get(1);
        Student s3 = map.get(2);
        System.out.println("s1:"+s1+" s2:"+s2+" s3:"+s3);

        System.out.println(s1==s2);
        System.out.println(s1==s3);
        System.out.println(s1.equals(s3));
        System.out.println(s1.equals(s2));
    }   
}

class Student{
    private String name;
    public Student(String name){        
        this.name = name;       
    }

    public String getName(){
        return this.name;
    }   
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T03:25:48+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 3:25 am

    You have misunderstood! Read the whole paragraph:

    What would happen if Integer did not override equals() and hashCode()?
    Nothing, if we never used an Integer as a key in a HashMap or other
    hash-based collection. However, if we were to use such an Integer
    object for a key in a HashMap, we would not be able to reliably
    retrieve the associated value, unless we used the exact same Integer
    instance in the get() call as we did in the put() call.

    http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-jtp05273/index.html

    This is saying that the Integer class must have a hashCode() method and equals() in order to work. It does have those methods, so it’s fine. It will work.

    The example was saying that references to objects that store values should not be compared because two Integers with the same integer value may actually be different objects.

    Integer x = new Integer(5);
    Integer y = new Integer(5);
    

    x.equals(y) is always true. x == y is not always true (but can be sometimes). The rules change for different ranges of value. Never rely on == for any object references unless you are completely sure you know what you are doing.

    Also note that you are passing int arguments (primitive types) not Integers (references to objects) but your collection’s generic type is Integer. This means there is also boxing to throw into the equation!

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a question about the volatile statement in Java. Please look at this
I have this sql statement: CREATE TABLE [dbo].[User]( [UserId] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL, [FirstName]
I have this query statement and want to only get records that has a
i have this MySQL statement from a search page, the user enters there postcode
I have this if statement that tests for the 2 conditions below. The second
I have seen this statement in many of the documention samples, like here This
REAL newbie here to Objective C and Cocoa. I have this 'if statement' if
I have kept hearing this statement. Switch..Case is Evil for code maintenance, but it
I'm learning objective-C and Cocoa and have come across this statement: The Cocoa frameworks
I have this very simple sql statement: SELECT max_dose FROM psychotropes WHERE (patient_meds.psychotrope =

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.