I have to following code:
List<Obj> coll = new List<Obj>();
if (cond1) coll.Add(new Obj { /*...*/ });
if (cond2) coll.Add(new Obj { /*...*/ });
if (cond3) coll.Add(new Obj { /*...*/ });
Is there a way to use LINQ or collection initializers for that?
EDIT:
The reason I want to use a collection initializer here is because I have an object tree which I do completely initialize with initialiers and LINQ. This spot is the only one which doesn’t follow this principle.
var myobj = new MyBigObj
{
Prop1 = from .. select ..,
Prop2 = from .. select ..,
...
Prop3 = new MySmallerObj
{
PropSmall1 = from .. select ..,
PropSmall2 = from .. select ..,
...
}
};
And now this simply doesn’t fit in my scheme:
List<Obj> coll = new List<Obj>();
if (cond1) coll.Add(new Obj { /*...*/ });
if (cond2) coll.Add(new Obj { /*...*/ });
if (cond3) coll.Add(new Obj { /*...*/ });
myobj.Prop4 = coll;
Sure I could put this code in a separate function that returns IEnumerable and call that.. 🙂
EDIT2:
It looks like I have to code some extension method which I would call like:
new Obj[0]
.ConditionalConcat(cond1, x=>new Obj { /*...*/ })
.ConditionalConcat(cond2, x=>new Obj { /*...*/ })
.ConditionalConcat(cond3, x=>new Obj { /*...*/ })
One fairly horrible option:
It’s not exactly simpler than the original code though 😉 (And also it unconditionally creates all the values – it’s only conditionally including them in the collection.)
EDIT: An alternative which only constructs the values when it needs to:
EDIT: Given your requested syntax, this is a fairly easy option:
with an extension method: