Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 192665
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T16:26:41+00:00 2026-05-11T16:26:41+00:00

I have to implement ISerializable in a derived class (to do some custom serialization/deserialization)

  • 0

I have to implement ISerializable in a derived class (to do some custom serialization/deserialization) but the parent class is marked as [Serializable]. The serialization “works” (I can serialize and deserialize without runtime errors) but it looks like the base class data isn’t being preserved.

Is the fact that I’m implementing GetObjectData in the derived class negating the serialization of the base class? If so, do I have to implement ISerializable in the base class and then call base.GetObjectData(…) in the derived class to preserve the data or is there a better way than writing info.AddValue(…) 100 times?

edit> Thank you Tim. You confirmed what I suspected. The problem itself goes one step further. The base class in my case implements BindingList(T) which iteself doesn’t implement ISerializable.

In the interim, for each property, I’ll try:
In the ISerializable constructor
base.Property = info.GetValue(…);

and in the GetObjectDate
info.AddValue(“name”, base.Property);

unless a better solution is put forward by the wonderful SO community.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T16:26:41+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 4:26 pm

    do I have to implement ISerializable in the base class and then call base.GetObjectData(…) in the derived class

    Yes. As soon as you implement ISerializable, any automatic serialization is switched off.

    Likewise, you’ll need to implement the protected serialization constructor in both the base class and the derived class.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 93k
  • Answers 93k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer From Saxon examples : System.setProperty("javax.xml.xpath.XPathFactory:"+NamespaceConstant.OBJECT_MODEL_SAXON, "net.sf.saxon.xpath.XPathFactoryImpl"); XPathFactory xpf = XPathFactory.newInstance(NamespaceConstant.OBJECT_MODEL_SAXON);… May 11, 2026 at 6:38 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Firstly, you want to comprehend what functional programming means; that… May 11, 2026 at 6:38 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The first uses DOM methods, and the second uses the… May 11, 2026 at 6:38 pm

Related Questions

As you know, in ASP.NET, you can store session data in one of following
I have an interface like so: public interface IDocument : ISerializable { Boolean HasBeenUploaded
I am heavily using byte array to transfer objects, primitive data, over the network
I'm running into problems serializing lots of objects in .NET. The object graph is
I have a project that I'm working on that requires changing a 'BaseSortedCollection' class

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.