Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 806035
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T00:10:54+00:00 2026-05-15T00:10:54+00:00

I have to read in a large record set, process it, then write it

  • 0

I have to read in a large record set, process it, then write it out to a flat file.

The large result set comes from a Stored Proc in SQL 2000.

I currently have:
var results = session.CreateSQLQuery(“exec usp_SalesExtract”).List();

I would like to be able to read the result set row by row, to reduce the memory foot print

Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T00:10:55+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 12:10 am

    NHibernate is not designed for that usage. Plus, you’re not really using its features.

    So, in this case, it’s better to use raw ADO.NET.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have created a solution which read a large csv file currently 20-30 mb
I have a very large codebase (read: thousands of modules) that has code shared
I have read (or perhaps heard from a colleague) that in .NET, TransactionScope can
I have a decent sized set of data that needs to be stored in
I have a python program that does something like this: Read a row from
I have a large table (2,000,000 rows) and I'd like to print each record
I have an ASP.NET application that does a large database read. It loads up
So I have this pretty large XML file (40MB) that I'll have to repeatedly
I have read through several reviews on Amazon and some books seem outdated. I
I have read a lot that LISP can redefine syntax on the fly, presumably

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.