Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1113391
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T02:51:01+00:00 2026-05-17T02:51:01+00:00

I have tokenized names (strings), with the tokens separated by underscores, which will always

  • 0

I have tokenized names (strings), with the tokens separated by underscores, which will always contain a “side” token by the value of M, L, or R.

The presence of that value is guaranteed to be unique (no repetitions or dangers that other tokens might get similar values).
In example:

foo_M_bar_type
foo_R_bar_type
foo_L_bar_type

I’d like, in a single regex, to swap L for R and viceversa whenever found, and M to be left untouched.
IE the above would become:

foo_M_bar_type
foo_L_bar_type
foo_R_bar_type

when pushed through this ideal expression.

This was what I thought to be a 10 minutes exercise while writing some simple stuff, that I couldn’t quite crack as concisely as I wanted to.

The problem itself was of course trivial to solve with one condition that changes the pattern, but I’d love some help doing it within a single re.sub()
Of course any food for thought is always welcome, but this being an intellectual exercise that me and a couple colleagues failed at I’d love to see it cracked that way.

And yes, I’m fully aware it might not be considered very Pythonic, nor ideal, to solve the problem with a regex, but humour me please 🙂

Thanks in advance

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T02:51:02+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 2:51 am

    This answer [ab]uses the replacement function:

    >>> s = "foo_M_bar_type foo_R_bar_type foo_L_bar_type"
    >>> import re
    >>> re.sub("_[LR]_", lambda m: {'_L_':'_R_','_R_':'_L_'}[m.group()], s)
    'foo_M_bar_type foo_L_bar_type foo_R_bar_type'
    >>>
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.