Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3229284
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T16:47:35+00:00 2026-05-17T16:47:35+00:00

I have two branches, and I am merging branch1 into branch2 with a no

  • 0

I have two branches, and I am merging branch1 into branch2 with a no fast-forward.

After the merge, I run the command ‘git show’, I only get the message that of the commit (which is the merge from the no fast-forward) and no list files that changed.

How do I get the list files changed in the merge?

SOLVED:

When at branch2 after the merge, I used the following:

git diff HEAD~

That returned the correct result.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T16:47:35+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 4:47 pm

    When at branch2 after the merge, I used the following:

    git diff HEAD~
    

    That returned the correct result.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Steps I performed: I have two branches branch1 and branch2, $git branch --Initial state
I have seen two different ways of merging local branches. git checkout master git
I've just finished merging two branches that have been separated for a long time,
I have two git branches, A and B, and commits numbered 1 thru 8.
I have two branches in my Git repository: master seotweaks (created originally from master
Is Mercurial always using the external merge tools when two branches that are merging
In SVN I have a tree conflict upon merging two branches. The tree conflict
I have two branches of my solution in GIT. One is X branch and
Related but not quite what I am looking for merge-two-branches-what-direction. Situation: I have inherited
I have a git repo with two divergent branches, production and v2. I'm working

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.