Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 905797
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T16:16:47+00:00 2026-05-15T16:16:47+00:00

I have two C functions, which basically operate on a stack data structure. This

  • 0

I have two C functions, which basically operate on a stack data structure. This one pushes a value of type OBJ which is actually just unsigned long to the top of the stack. The stack is also grown if necessary.

OBJ Quotation_push_(CzState *cz, CzQuotation *self, OBJ object)
{
    if ((self->size + 1) > self->cap) {
        self->items = (OBJ *)CZ_REALLOC(self->items, sizeof(OBJ) * (self->cap + 1) * 2);
        self->cap = (self->cap + 1) * 2;
    }
    self->items[self->size++] = object;
    return (OBJ)self;
}

The next function inserts an OBJ into an arbitrary position in the self->items array. Try as I might, it just won’t work properly. I use Quotation_push_ here with a dummy value to get the automatic growth behavior. The problem is that I always see the CZ_NIL dummy value at the end of the array, with the item I’m trying to insert just overwriting what’s in the position already. Here’s what I’ve got so far:

OBJ Quotation_insert_(CzState *cz, CzQuotation *self, OBJ object, int pos)
{
    printf("have to move %d OBJ from %d to %d\n", self->size - pos, pos, pos + 1);
    Quotation_push_(cz, self, CZ_NIL);
    memmove(self->items + ((pos + 1) * sizeof(OBJ)), self->items + (pos * sizeof(OBJ)), sizeof(OBJ) * (self->size - pos));
    self->items[pos] = object;
    return (OBJ)self;
}

I’m not getting any segfaults or errors, it just doesn’t work as expected. Any ideas?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T16:16:47+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 4:16 pm

    updated:

    There are two problems, both in the call to memmove.

    The first is an off-by-one error in the number of bytes that should be moved. The correct number would be:

    sizeof(OBJ) * (self->size - pos - 1)
    

    Omitting the -1 will actually move one too many bytes, placing your new CZ_NIL object past the end of the buffer.

    The second problem is bigger, but more subtle. Adding integers to a pointer causes the compiler to perform pointer arithmetic, which automatically accounts for the size of the objects being pointed to. See this question for details. Here’s the short version: self->items is an array of OBJ, so you don’t need to include sizeof(OBJ) in the first two arguments to memmove.

    Putting it all together, the proper function call would look like this:

    memmove((self->items + pos + 1),
            (self->items + pos),
            sizeof(OBJ) * (self->size - pos - 1));
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 445k
  • Answers 445k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer First you need some database calls to get the questions.… May 15, 2026 at 6:49 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer clrscr() is a nonstandard function (neither mentioned in ISO C99… May 15, 2026 at 6:49 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If you want to embed the partial content, you could… May 15, 2026 at 6:49 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.