Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6707993
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T07:42:21+00:00 2026-05-26T07:42:21+00:00

I have two classes: class A { int get(); string str(); } string A::str()

  • 0

I have two classes:

class A {
    int get();
    string str();
}

string A::str() {
    return string_with( get() );
}

class B : public A{
    int get();
}

if I do:

A a
B b
b.str()

b will invoke A::str() (good) and it ill use A::get() method (bad!). I want, that when I invoke b.str(), the B::get() is used by str.

How to make it work?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T07:42:21+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 7:42 am

    Just make it virtual. That’s exactly what virtual is for.

    Write

    virtual int get();
    

    in A’s definition. And, just to make the code more understandable, do the same in B’s.

    By the way, I’m assuming that you meant to write class B : public A.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have two classes class A { public string something { get; set; }
I have two Classes : class Customer { public string Fullname { get; set;
I have two classes: public class RichMan { public string ID {get;set;} List<Car> _cars=new
Suppose I have two classes: public class Student { public int Id {get; set;}
Say you have these two classes. public class Author { public int ID {get;
I have two entity classes: public class Invoice { public int ID { get;
Let's say we have these two classes: public class Base { public static int
I have a two classes: public class Question { public IList<Answer> Answers { get;
I have the following two classes: public class Address { public string AddressLine1 {
Say i have the following two classes: public class User { public int ID

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.