Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6184525
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T01:33:04+00:00 2026-05-24T01:33:04+00:00

I have two classes: struct B {}; struct D { operator B& (); };

  • 0

I have two classes:

struct B {};
struct D {
  operator B& ();
};

When I do;

b = d; // B b; ... D d;

Result is as per expectation where D::operator B&() is invoked (Demo).

If the D is changed to,

struct D : B {
  operator B& ();
};

then D::operator B&() is not invoked (Demo). Is B::B(const B&) is finding a better candidate in D then D::operator B&() ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T01:33:06+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 1:33 am

    If D derives from B, there is an implicit automatic conversion from D to B. This has higher precedence than a user-defined conversion operator.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have two classes: Account and Operator. Account contains a list of Operators. Now,
I have two vector classes: typedef struct D3DXVECTOR3 { FLOAT x; FLOAT y; FLOAT
In a C++ program I have two classes (structs) like struct A { int
I have two classes test1 and test2: struct test1 { int r; test1() {}
I have two classes: MazeClass and CreatureClass, that use a struct called "coordinates," how
I have an MFC C++ program that contains two classes, as follows; struct MyStruct
A little question about creating objects. Say I have these two classes: struct A{
If I have two classes: template <typename T> struct Node { ... }; tempalte
I have two classes, and want to include a static instance of one class
I have two classes, Foo and Bar, that have constructors like this: class Foo

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.