Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8660227
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 12, 20262026-06-12T16:12:15+00:00 2026-06-12T16:12:15+00:00

I have two data sets. Table1 has just one record. Table2 has many records.

  • 0

I have two data sets. Table1 has just one record. Table2 has many records. I want to combine these so that the variables from Table1 are added to every record in Table2.

I know this can be done with proc sql like this:

proc sql;
 create table3 as
  select *
  from table1, table2;
quit;

I want the same result, but using a data step. What’s the best (elegant, efficient) way to do this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-12T16:12:16+00:00Added an answer on June 12, 2026 at 4:12 pm
    data table3;
    if _n_ = 1 then set table1;
    set table2;
    run;
    

    That’s the simplest way.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Have two sets of data (two tables) for patient records, one 1999-2003, the other
I have two types of data sets. Both are in same size. One contains
Here's the situation. I have two sets of data. One is a list of
I have two data sets in google app engine datastore. class First_Set(db.Model): start_time =
I have two data sets, each dataset contains the pixel values of an image.
I have two sets of data, (Ax, Ay; Bx, By). I'd like to plot
I have two Data Centers, each one with replication factor 3. Will write with
I have two data sources: a legacy one (web service) and a database one.
I have two data models: Writer.AttributValeur and Writer.Produit . Writer.Produit has HasMany / BelongsTo
i have two data classes which hold only data members(no functions). One is CallTask

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.