Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8761909
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T15:23:48+00:00 2026-06-13T15:23:48+00:00

I have two databases on a local machine, connected to localhost . They both

  • 0

I have two databases on a local machine, connected to localhost. They both have roughly two million rows a piece. I was doing the following very simple join and it took over a minute to complete.

select distinct x.patid
    from [i 3 sci study].dbo.clm_extract as x
    left join [i 3 study].dbo.claims as y on y.patid=x.patid
    where y.patid is null

When I looked at the execution plan I saw that the join showplan operator had this to say
enter image description here

Why is the actual number of rows so exorbitantly high compared to the actual number of rows in both tables?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T15:23:49+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 3:23 pm

    The LEFT JOIN will match each row on the left with each row on the right, and then filter. Assuming patid is not unique in either table, the number of possible match combinations could get very high.

    Try the following:

    SET NOCOUNT ON;
    GO
    CREATE TABLE #t1 (Id INT NOT NULL);
    CREATE TABLE #t2 (Id INT NOT NULL);
    GO
    
    INSERT #t1 (Id)
    VALUES (1);
    GO 100
    
    INSERT #t2 (Id)
    SELECT Id FROM #t1;
    GO
    

    Now look at the execution plan for the left join query form:

    SELECT *
    FROM #t1
    LEFT OUTER JOIN #t2 ON #t1.Id = #t2.Id
    WHERE #t2.Id IS NULL;
    

    Looking at the execution plan, the hash join shows 10,000 actual rows (100 from #t1 x 100 from #t2). This shows the advantage of checking for existence (or a lack thereof) using any of the following T-SQL syntaxes:

    SELECT #t1.Id
    FROM #t1
    WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM #t2 WHERE Id = #t1.Id);
    
    -- #t2.Id must not contain any NULLs for this to be correct
    SELECT #t1.Id
    FROM #t1
    WHERE Id NOT IN (SELECT #t2.Id FROM #t2);
    
    -- Returns DISTINCT #t1 values
    SELECT Id
    FROM #t1
    EXCEPT
    SELECT Id 
    FROM #t2;
    

    Checking for a lack of existence enables the engine to short circuit. This is due to the anti semi join. As soon as the first match is found, it moves on to the next record. For more details, see this blog post.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have two databases on one machine that also has two different sites running
I have two databases at two different places, both databases are same with table
I have two SQL Server (2000) databases. Both are used for the same project,
I have two huge databases in both formats CSV & XML, and I want
I have two local databases I'm trying to connect to using Java's Connection class.
I have two databases named: DB_A and DB_B . Each database has one collection
We have two databases, in two separate locations. One of the databases resides in
I have two databases in SQL2k5: one that holds a large amount of static
I have the situation where i have two databases with same structure. The first
Let's say I have two SQL Server databases running on separate machines, call them

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.