Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7551449
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 30, 20262026-05-30T10:29:51+00:00 2026-05-30T10:29:51+00:00

I have two examples that first is @OneToOne unidirectional mapping and second bidirectional. In

  • 0

I have two examples that first is @OneToOne unidirectional mapping and second bidirectional. In unidirectional mapping, the owning-side table must contain a join column that refers to the other table’s id; then in bidirectional both of them must contain a foreign key column for each other. But after generating the database schema with autogenerate strategy, two examples have the same effect on database schema. Unidirectional mapping is normal but the bidirectional example only contains one foreign key column, but it must be involve each other’s foreign key!

Unidirectional Mapping

@Entity
public class Customer43 {

@Id
@GeneratedValue
private Long id;
private String firstName;
private String lastName;
private String email;
private String phoneNumber;
@OneToOne
@JoinColumn(name = "address_fk")
private Address43 address;

// Getters, Setters and Constructors.
}

@Entity
public class Address43 {

@Id
@GeneratedValue
private Long id;
private String street1;
private String street2;
private String city;
private String state;
private String zipcode;
private String country;

// Getters, Setters and Constructors.
}

Bidirectional Mapping

@Entity
public class Customer44 {

@Id
@GeneratedValue
private Long id;
private String firstName;
private String lastName;
private String email;
private String phoneNumber;
@OneToOne
@JoinColumn(name = "address_fk")
private Address43 address;

// Getters, Setters and Constructors.
}

@Entity
public class Address44 {

@Id
@GeneratedValue
private Long id;
private String street1;
private String street2;
private String city;
private String state;
private String zipcode;
private String country;
@OneToOne(mappedBy = "address")
private Customer44 customer;

// Getters, Setters and Constructors.
}

Why is the database schema output the same and why does bidirectional mapping act like unidirectional?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-30T10:29:52+00:00Added an answer on May 30, 2026 at 10:29 am

    Because you didn’t understand how a bidirectional OneToOne is mapped. You don’t need two foreign keys. A single one is sufficient to perform a join between both tables, in both directions:

    select a.* from address a inner join customer c on c.addressId = a.id;
    select c.* from customer c inner join address a on c.addressId = a.id;
    

    The fact that the association is unidirectional or bidirectional doesn’t change how the tables are linked together. It just changes the mapping, and allows navigating through the association in both directions.

    In a bidirectional association, you always have an owning side (which tells how the association is mapped, using which join column), and an inverse side, where you just say: I’m the other side of the association that is mapped by this field (the field in the mappedBy attribute value) in the target entity.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have seen two examples that illustrate how the client socket can receive messages
I have two examples I have a question about. Let me explain via some
Example: I have two shared objects (same should apply to .dlls). The first shared
I have two tables, for example: Table A Table B ======= ======= Name |
I have two data.frames. For examples sake let's say they look like this: df1
I have a lisview that I want to add images to. The examples that
I have a situation in which we have two production databases that synchronize with
I have two tables. The first Holds a list of classes with basically an
First, two examples: // This works int foo = 43; long lFoo = foo;
I have two examples to show you what I want to achieve here. But

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.