Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3485382
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T10:54:03+00:00 2026-05-18T10:54:03+00:00

I have two existing indices in a DB as below CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX IndexTable1

  • 0

I have two existing indices in a DB as below

  1. CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX IndexTable1
    ON Table (fkAnothertable)

  2. CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX IndexTable2
    ON Table (fkAnothertable)
    INCLUDE (pkTable)

I had a hunch and my research seems to point that any queries that call #1 would be satisfied by #2 and that #1 is wasteful. I couldn’t find a definitive answer though.

Is this assumption correct and can I drop #1 and potentially improve performance?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T10:54:04+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 10:54 am

    Yes. #2 entirely covers #1 and possibly vice-versa in fact. Is pkTable your clustered index key? If so that will be included in #1 (at the key level because the non clustered index is not declared as unique).

    If pkTable is not the clustering key then queries seeking on #1 will still be satisfied by #2 but #2 may occupy more pages thus making scans that would have used #1 a tad less efficient.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have two already-existing tables which look (in part) roughly like this: CREATE TABLE
Let's say I have two existing tables, dogs and cats: dog_name | owner ---------+------
I have two identical tables and need to copy rows from table to another.
I have two classes, and want to include a static instance of one class
I have two existing tables, with different fields, except for Primary ID (a varchar
Let's say I have two existing tables, dogs and cats: dog_name | owner ---------+------
I have two different existing Database design's in the legacy apps I inherited. On
I have two assemblies A & B. A has existing reference to B and
I have two tables in an existing (MSSQL 2008 R2) database that are related
I have two tables (MS SQL Server 2005) with an existing application (no DB

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.