Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 394059
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T16:19:07+00:00 2026-05-12T16:19:07+00:00

I have two feature branches: featureA and featureB. FeatureA is complete, but not merged

  • 0

I have two feature branches: featureA and featureB.

FeatureA is complete, but not merged into trunk because it’s untested and we’re not ready to test it yet.

I’m working on featureB, and have realised that a change implemented in featureA is required for me to continue.

What’s the best approach? I think I have a couple of options:

Option 1

Merge featureA to featureB branch (or maybe just specific revisions if I’m careful to get all the ones I want), then revert all but the changes I need.

Option 2

Re-implement the changes in featureB (they’re not too complex this time) and sort out the conflicts when featureA and featureB are merged into the same place.

Either way, the features will be merged into a release candidate branch ready for testing and deployment. Once that RC branch is confirmed as tested, it’ll be merged into trunk in one go.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T16:19:08+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 4:19 pm

    There’s a third option:

    You can cherry-pick what you want to merge, and merge just that. Perform a merge from featureA to featureB, but only merge the revisions that you are interested in. Then optionally fix any remaining problems.

    In Eclipse e.g. this can be done quite conveniently, because the merge dialog will let you select which revision (or which range) you want to merge. Just repeat that for all the revision ranges you need.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.