Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7819993
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 2, 20262026-06-02T07:08:35+00:00 2026-06-02T07:08:35+00:00

I have two objects that should be registered together, and also share the same

  • 0

I have two objects that should be registered together, and also share the same lifetime scoping. I would like to provide a registration extension to encapsulate this and retain the registration fluency, but I need some help. Here’s the situation I’m in:

public static IRegistrationBuilder<?, ?, ?> 
  RegisterChannel<T>(this ContainerBuilder builder, Func<IComponentContext, ChannelFactory<T>> @delegate)
{
  // channelfactory and sharedchannel should have same lifetime configuration
  var channelfactoryreg = builder.Register(c => @delegate(c));
  var sharereg = builder.RegisterType<Wcf.SharedChannel<T>>();

  // is it possible to combine them and return?
  return ???;
}

How do I fill in the blanks so that I can write (e.g.) builder.RegisterTwo().SingleInstance()? Is it possible to directly or indirectly “union” two IRegistrationBuilderTLAR objects, so that configuring the result configures all the underlying registrations, or is there another way to do this?

More generally: is there a primer out there for working with the Autofac internals?

Thanks for your time.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-02T07:08:37+00:00Added an answer on June 2, 2026 at 7:08 am

    Gosh, I hate answering my own Q, but all suggested alternatives seemed off-point or too complicated. Nick’s comment came the closest to engaging, but only succeeded in scaring me off Autofac internals entirely ;). I investigated, but that was overkill for my situation.

    I ended up splitting the difference (as implied in my comment above), abandoning the fluent interface, but still allowing for flexible continuation of the registration by accepting the config into the method itself:

        public static void RegisterSharedChannel<T>(this ContainerBuilder builder, Func<IComponentContext, ChannelFactory<T>> @delegate, 
            Action<Autofac.Builder.IRegistrationBuilder<object, Autofac.Builder.IConcreteActivatorData, Autofac.Builder.SingleRegistrationStyle>> config)
        {
            builder.Register(c => c.Resolve<Wcf.ISharedChannel<T>>().GetChannel()).ExternallyOwned();
            //would be really nice to be able to retain the fluency of the interface, but: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8608415/fluent-configuration-of-multiple-registrations
            //this should suffice for now...
            var facreg = builder.Register(c => @delegate(c));
            var sharereg = builder.RegisterType<Wcf.SharedChannel<T>>().AsImplementedInterfaces();
            config(facreg);
            config(sharereg);
        }
    

    The calling syntax isn’t as pretty (e.g.:

    builder.RegisterSharedChannel(c => BuildChannelFactory(...), r => r.SingleInstance());
    

    but all (most of?) the flexibility is still there.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Ok, NHibernate question here. I have two objects that I would like to map
I have two LinkedList objects that are always of the same size. I want
Suppose that I have two objects with the same property name that I am
I have a static method that should take two objects and a float as
I need to do operations like compare that two number arrays have the same
I have two objects that can be represented as an int, float, bool, or
I have a list of objects that have two int properties. The list is
Let's say we have two objects. Furthermore, let's assume that they really have no
I have an interface and two objects implementing that interface, massively simplied; public interface
I display some objects that have thumbnails in two ways: one in a DataGridView,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.