Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6841019
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T23:54:54+00:00 2026-05-26T23:54:54+00:00

I have two objects(of the same type) which contains a prop myprop of type

  • 0

I have two objects(of the same type) which contains a prop myprop of type byte?. The properties are set to null. When I perform objectA.myprop.Equals(objectB.myprop) I get ‘true’ as a result although the MSDN code sample states that “Equals applied to any null object returns false.”

I’m guessing C# uses a seperate overload for nullable type comparisons. I would like to know how C# internally treats objects versus nullable types in this case.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T23:54:55+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 11:54 pm

    When you call it like that, it will use Nullable<T>.Equals(object) which shows the expected behaviour in the documentation:

    (Return value is true if…)

    The HasValue property is false, and the other parameter is null. That is, two null values are equal by definition.

    Likewise for equality via ==, section 7.3.7 of the C# 4 spec (lifted operators) states:

    For the equality operators == [and] != a lifted form of an operator exists if the operand types are both non-nullable value types and if the result type is bool. The lifted form is constructed by adding a single ? modifier to each operand type. The lifted operator considers two null values equal, and a null value unequal to any non-null value. If both operands are non-null, the lifted operator unwraps the operands and applies the underlying operator to produce the bool result.

    (Emphasis mine.)

    This is a general rule, in terms of the implementation of object.Equals:

    The following statements must be true for all implementations of the Equals method. In the list, x, y, and z represent object references that are not null.

    […]

    • x.Equals(null) returns false.

    So while it is a general rule, it doesn’t apply in this specific case – because the value here isn’t an object reference – it’s a value type value. It’s still somewhat surprising, unless you basically accept that Nullable<T> is a bit of a special case – it has specific C# compiler support and it has CLR support in terms of boxing and unboxing.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a situation where two objects of the same type have parents of
When comparing two objects (of the same type), it makes sense to have a
I have two LINQ objects which have exactly the same columns and I would
I have a class that contains two arraylists which I'm trying to store objects
I have two objects of the same type and need to copy property values
I have two Maps that contain the same type of Objects: Map<String, TaskJSO> a
I have two objects both of the same type, for instance: typedef struct s_Object
I have two objects of the same type, and I want to loop through
Example: I have two shared objects (same should apply to .dlls). The first shared
Suppose that I have two objects with the same property name that I am

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.