Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 734885
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T07:25:29+00:00 2026-05-14T07:25:29+00:00

I have two overloaded methods, one with an optional parameter. void foo(string a) {

  • 0

I have two overloaded methods, one with an optional parameter.

void foo(string a)  { }  
void foo(string a, int b = 0) { }  

now I call:

 foo("abc");

interestingly the first overload is called.
why not the second overload with optional value set to zero?

To be honest, I would have expect the compiler to bring an error, at least a warning to avoid unintentional execution of the wrong method.

What’s the reason for this behaviour? Why did the C# team define it that way?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T07:25:30+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 7:25 am

    From MSDN:

    If two candidates are judged to be equally good, preference goes to a candidate that does not have optional parameters for which arguments were omitted in the call. This is a consequence of a general preference in overload resolution for candidates that have fewer parameters.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 492k
  • Answers 492k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If the number will always be 0-9, you can use… May 16, 2026 at 10:30 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I used FakeItEasy http://code.google.com/p/fakeiteasy/. I created a mock of SqlDatabase… May 16, 2026 at 10:30 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I guess its the fifth question related to the same… May 16, 2026 at 10:30 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

I have a class that contains two methods like these: public String getFoo(Int32 a)
I have a Person object with two constructors - one takes an int (personId),
I have two functions : void foo(const char * p) and template<size_t T_Size> void
I have two tables in a legacy database... tblParentTable (int id, string specialIdentifier, ...)
Suppose I have an existing assembly, and some of the classes have overloaded methods,
I have two xml files but one file will contain an extra field. Ideally
i have two richtextboxes one below the other in my application.when the user start
I have two tables: CREATE TABLE 'sales_sheet' ( `_id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, `_typed_by`
I have two lists: List<string> _list1; List<string> _list2; I need add all _list2 different
Are there any best practices on returning different return types on overloaded methods? For

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.