Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5845827
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T12:29:25+00:00 2026-05-22T12:29:25+00:00

I have two processes which are communicating over a pair of sockets created with

  • 0

I have two processes which are communicating over a pair of sockets created with socketpair() and SOCK_SEQPACKET. Like this:

int ipc_sockets[2];
socketpair(PF_LOCAL, SOCK_SEQPACKET, 0, ipc_sockets);

As I understand it, I should see MSG_EOR in the msg_flags member of “struct msghdr” when receiving a SOCK_SEQPACKET record. I am setting MSG_EOR in sendmsg() to be certain that the record is marked MSG_EOR, but I do not see it when receiving in recvmsg(). I’ve even tried to set MSG_EOR in the msg_flags field before sending the record, but that made no difference at all.

I think I should see MSG_EOR unless the record was cut short by, e.g. a signal, but I do not. Why is that?

I’ve pasted my sending and receiving code in below.

Thanks,
jules

int
send_fd(int fd,
        void *data,
        const uint32_t len,
        int fd_to_send,
        uint32_t * const bytes_sent)
{
    ssize_t n;
    struct msghdr msg;
    struct iovec iov;

    memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(struct msghdr));
    memset(&iov, 0, sizeof(struct iovec));

#ifdef HAVE_MSGHDR_MSG_CONTROL
    union {
        struct cmsghdr cm;
        char control[CMSG_SPACE_SIZEOF_INT];
    } control_un;
    struct cmsghdr *cmptr;

    msg.msg_control = control_un.control;
    msg.msg_controllen = sizeof(control_un.control);
    memset(msg.msg_control, 0, sizeof(control_un.control));

    cmptr = CMSG_FIRSTHDR(&msg);
    cmptr->cmsg_len = CMSG_LEN(sizeof(int));
    cmptr->cmsg_level = SOL_SOCKET;
    cmptr->cmsg_type = SCM_RIGHTS;
    *((int *) CMSG_DATA(cmptr)) = fd_to_send;
#else
    msg.msg_accrights = (caddr_t) &fd_to_send;
    msg.msg_accrightslen = sizeof(int);
#endif
    msg.msg_name = NULL;
    msg.msg_namelen = 0;

    iov.iov_base = data;
    iov.iov_len = len;
    msg.msg_iov = &iov;
    msg.msg_iovlen = 1;

#ifdef __linux__
    msg.msg_flags = MSG_EOR;
    n = sendmsg(fd, &msg, MSG_EOR);
#elif defined __APPLE__
    n = sendmsg(fd, &msg, 0); /* MSG_EOR is not supported on Mac                                                                                                                                                                        
                               * OS X due to lack of                                                                                                                                                                                    
                               * SOCK_SEQPACKET support on                                                                                                                                                                              
                               * socketpair() */
#endif
    switch (n) {
    case EMSGSIZE:
        return EMSGSIZE;
    case -1:
        return 1;
    default:
        *bytes_sent = n;
    }

    return 0;
}

int
recv_fd(int fd,
        void *buf,
        const uint32_t len,
        int *recvfd,
        uint32_t * const bytes_recv)
{
    struct msghdr msg;
    struct iovec iov;
    ssize_t n = 0;
#ifndef HAVE_MSGHDR_MSG_CONTROL
    int newfd;
#endif
    memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(struct msghdr));
    memset(&iov, 0, sizeof(struct iovec));

#ifdef HAVE_MSGHDR_MSG_CONTROL
    union {
        struct cmsghdr  cm;
        char control[CMSG_SPACE_SIZEOF_INT];
    } control_un;
    struct cmsghdr *cmptr;

    msg.msg_control = control_un.control;
    msg.msg_controllen = sizeof(control_un.control);
    memset(msg.msg_control, 0, sizeof(control_un.control));
#else
    msg.msg_accrights = (caddr_t) &newfd;
    msg.msg_accrightslen = sizeof(int);
#endif
    msg.msg_name = NULL;
    msg.msg_namelen = 0;

    iov.iov_base = buf;
    iov.iov_len = len;
    msg.msg_iov = &iov;
    msg.msg_iovlen = 1;

    if (recvfd)
        *recvfd = -1;

    n = recvmsg(fd, &msg, 0);
    if (msg.msg_flags) { // <== I should see MSG_EOR here if the entire record was received
        return 1;
    }
    if (bytes_recv)
        *bytes_recv = n;
    switch (n) {
    case 0:
        *bytes_recv = 0;
        return 0;
    case -1:
        return 1;
    default:
        break;
    }

#ifdef HAVE_MSGHDR_MSG_CONTROL
    if ((NULL != (cmptr = CMSG_FIRSTHDR(&msg))) 
        && cmptr->cmsg_len == CMSG_LEN(sizeof(int))) {
        if (SOL_SOCKET != cmptr->cmsg_level) {
            return 0;
        }
        if (SCM_RIGHTS != cmptr->cmsg_type) {
            return 0;
        }
        if (recvfd)
            *recvfd = *((int *) CMSG_DATA(cmptr));
    }
#else
    if (recvfd && (sizeof(int) == msg.msg_accrightslen))
        *recvfd = newfd;
#endif
    return 0;
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T12:29:26+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 12:29 pm

    With SOCK_SEQPACKET unix domain sockets the only way for the message to be cut short is if the buffer you give to recvmsg() isn’t big enough (and in that case you’ll get MSG_TRUNC).

    POSIX says that SOCK_SEQPACKET sockets must set MSG_EOR at the end of a record, but Linux unix domain sockets don’t.

    (Refs: POSIX 2008 2.10.10 says SOCK_SEQPACKET must support records, and 2.10.6 says record boundaries are visible to the receiver via the MSG_EOR flag.)

    What a ‘record’ means for a given protocol is up to the implementation to define.

    If Linux did implement MSG_EOR for unix domain sockets, I think the only sensible way would be to say that each packet was a record in itself, and so always set MSG_EOR (or maybe always set it when not setting MSG_TRUNC), so it wouldn’t be informative anyway.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have two process and a shared memory zone, my workflow is like this.
I am communicating between two processes using WCF. By default this produces very obscure
i have the following Problem: i have two Processes process A which starts process
We have a vxWorks design which requires one task to process messages from two
I have two processes one will query other for data.There will be huge amount
I have two C++ processes (A and B), executing under Windows, where one launches
I have two unrelated processes that use .NET assemblies as plugins. However, either process
I have two running processes in Windows, and each process has a pipe to
I have a very simple interface which needs to communicate between processes. It's currently
We have two websites that share some business processes and UI elements. Lets focus

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.