Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 97215
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T23:57:42+00:00 2026-05-10T23:57:42+00:00

I have two tables, we’ll call them Foo and Bar , with a one

  • 0

I have two tables, we’ll call them Foo and Bar, with a one to many relationship where Foo is the parent of Bar. Foo’s primary key is an integer automatically generated with a sequence.

Since Bar is fully dependent on Foo how would I setup the primary key of Bar given the following constraints:

  • Records for Bar are programatically generated so user input can not be relied upon for an identifier.
  • Multiple processes are generating Bar records so anything involving a Select Max() to generate an ID would present a race condition.

I have come up with two possible solutions that I am not happy with:

  • Treat the tables as if they are a many to many relationship with a third table that maps their records together and have the application code handle inserting records so that the mapping between the records is created correctly. I don’t like this as it makes the database design misleading and errors in application code could result in invalid data.
  • Give Bar two colunms: FooID and FooBarID and generate a value for FooBarID by selecting the max(FooBarID)+1 for some FooID, but as previously stated this creates a race condition.

I appreciate any ideas for an alternative table layout.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 1 View
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T23:57:43+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 11:57 pm

    Give Bar an automatic primary key the same as with Foo. Add a foreign key FooID column to Bar.

    Unless I’m missing something, there doesn’t seem to be a reason why it wouldn’t work.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.