Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8163643
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 6, 20262026-06-06T19:06:37+00:00 2026-06-06T19:06:37+00:00

I have two threads, lets say thread A and thread B. Thread A post’s

  • 0

I have two threads, lets say thread “A” and thread “B”.
Thread “A” post’s custom QEvent to thread “B”, and then it should wait till thread “B” processes this event.

What I did so far:

My event class:

class IPCMessageEvent : public QEvent
{
public:
   IPCMessageEvent(QWaitCondition* pConditions) : QEvent(IPC_MESSAGE_RECEIVED)
                                                , mpWaitCondition(pConditions)
   { };
   ~IPCMessageEvent()
   {
      mpWaitCondition->wakeOne();
   };
private:
   QWaitCondition* mpWaitCondition;
};

My thread “A”:

QWaitCondition recvCondition;
IPCMessageEvent* pEvent = new IPCMessageEvent(&recvCondition);

QCoreApplication::postEvent(gpApp, pEvent);

QMutex  mutex; 
        mutex.lock();

recvCondition.wait(&mutex, IPC_MESSAGE_WAIT_TIMEOUT);

My thread “B”: Processes the received event and destroyes it. ~IPCMessageEvent destructor is called and therefore wakeOne() will be initiated for the recvCondition in thread “A”.

Everything seems to work just fine, it’s just one thing!
It looks like sometimes ~IPCMessageEvent is called sooner then expected…

QCoreApplication::postEvent(gpApp, pEvent);

<---- pEvent is already destroyed here ---->

QMutex mutex; 
       mutex.lock();

So my recvCondition.wait(&mutex, IPC_MESSAGE_WAIT_TIMEOUT); will be locked and will reach the timeout.

Are there any other ways of doing this kind of synchronization?
Or maybe someone have any suggestions how to fix/overcome this problem?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-06T19:06:38+00:00Added an answer on June 6, 2026 at 7:06 pm

    Well, you have a classical race condition. Your thread A may is interrupted directly after posting the event and thread B then processes and destroys it. Since notifications of condition variables have only an effect if somebody is already waiting, you miss the notification and thus your block infinitely.

    So you need to lock the mutex before posting the event. However, this requires that your thread B also needs to lock this mutex when processing the event. Otherwise, you cannot prevent the race condition as thread B has no reason to wait for anything (or to know that it should “wait” until thread A is ready waiting on the condition variable).

    Alternative:

    If you use a signal/slot connection between the two threads (or the objects living in the two threads), you can use a Qt::BlockingQueuedConnection. This ensures that thread A blocks after emitting the signal until the event loop in thread B processed it.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have two threads, one thread processes a queue and the other thread adds
Let's say I have two threads, T1 and T2. Thread T1 makes a blocking
Lets say we have two Threads A, B and one Mutex (Shared resource) M.
I have two threads modifying the same object, lets say MyObject, and so have
I'd like to have two Threads. Let's call them : Thread A Thread B
I have two threads, a producer thread that places objects into a generic List
I have two threads referencing the same variable -- the UI thread and a
I currently have two threads running in my program: Main thread - Grabs image
I have a design problem: I have two threads, a heartbeat/control thread and a
My problem is this: I have two threads, my UI thread, and a worker

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.