Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8123281
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 6, 20262026-06-06T06:07:50+00:00 2026-06-06T06:07:50+00:00

I have two threads, one reading streams and producing data-objects from their content. I

  • 0

I have two threads, one reading streams and producing data-objects from their content.

I then have to pass them to the second thread, writing them into a database.

I want to separate the two tasks (that’s why I took two threads) because I/O-Performance on the streams and the database varies. In some cases, the stream is fast, sometimes, the db has some lag.

So I thought of putting some (very simple!) data-storage between them.

My first idea was a FILO-solution, has to be Thread-safe and should be fast (no fancy stuff, just put and pull). The order does not matter. At some time there could be around 100,000 Entries in the storage (that would be the case after around one second ping with the db).

Each object has a small footprint, <1kb.

What would you recommend to me?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-06T06:07:52+00:00Added an answer on June 6, 2026 at 6:07 am

    This is exactly the producer-consumer pattern. Take a look at BlockingQueue and its implementations.

    Here is sample code from my blog:

    public class Producer implements Runnable {
        private BlockingQueue queue;
    
        public Producer(BlockingQueue queue) {
            this.queue = queue;
        }
    
        @Override
        public void run() {
            //Produce 1000 products
            for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
                queue.put(new Product());
                System.out.println("PRODUCED PRODUCT");
            }
        }
    }
    public class Consumer implements Runnable {
        private BlockingQueue queue;
    
        public Consumer(BlockingQueue queue) {
            this.queue = queue;
        }
    
        @Override
        public void run() {
            while (true) {
                Product product = queue.take();
                System.out.println("CONSUMED PRODUCT");
            }
        }
    }
    
    And here is the calling code:
    BlockingQueue queue = new ArrayBlockingQueue(50);
    
    Producer producer = new Producer(queue);
    new Thread(producer).start();
    
    Consumer consumer = new Consumer(queue);
    new Thread(consumer).start();
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have two threads. One of them writes to PipedOutputStream, another one reads from
I have two threads, one updating an int and one reading it. This is
I have two threads, one for data acquisition and the other one for display.
In one of my integration tests, I have two threads that uninstall then install
I have two threads, one thread processes a queue and the other thread adds
I have a ThreadManager with two Threads. One for gui-relevant requests and one for
I have two tables, one is a table of forum threads. It has a
I have an application that has two threads. The first one (the main thread)
I have two threads, a producer thread that places objects into a generic List
I'd like to have two Threads. Let's call them : Thread A Thread B

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.