Home/ Questions/Q 43509
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-10T15:30:23+00:00

I have two threads, one updating an int and one reading it. This is

  • 0

I have two threads, one updating an int and one reading it. This is a statistic value where the order of the reads and writes is irrelevant.

My question is, do I need to synchronize access to this multi-byte value anyway? Or, put another way, can part of the write be complete and get interrupted, and then the read happen.

For example, think of a value = 0x0000FFFF that gets incremented value of 0x00010000.

Is there a time where the value looks like 0x0001FFFF that I should be worried about? Certainly the larger the type, the more possible something like this to happen.

I’ve always synchronized these types of accesses, but was curious what the community thinks.

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. At first one might think that reads and writes of the native machine size are atomic but there are a number of issues to deal with including cache coherency between processors/cores. Use atomic operations like Interlocked* on Windows and the equivalent on Linux. C++0x will have an ‘atomic’ template to wrap these in a nice and cross-platform interface. For now if you are using a platform abstraction layer it may provide these functions. ACE does, see the class template ACE_Atomic_Op.

    • 0