Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 880431
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T12:05:48+00:00 2026-05-15T12:05:48+00:00

I have type hierarchy defined like this: interface IMyClass { } interface IBase1<T> {

  • 0

I have type hierarchy defined like this:

interface IMyClass
{
}

interface IBase1<T>
{
}

interface IBase2<T>
{
}

interface IMyDerived1 : IBase1<IMyClass>
{
}

class Base1<T, U> : IBase1<T>
    where U : IBase2<T>
{
}

class Base2<T, U> : IBase2<T>
    where U : IBase1<T>
{
}

class Derived1<T, U> : Base1<T, U>, IMyDerived1
    where T : IMyClass
    where U : IBase2<T>
{
}

class Derived2<T, U> : Base2<T, U*>
    where T : IMyClass
    where U : IMyDerived1
{
}

but Visual Studio 2008 (.net 3.5 SP1) says that parameter U in parent specifier of Derived2 (marked with *) is not convertible to IBase1<T>. Is this solvable?

EDIT:

It indeed looks like generics overuse but allows Base1,2 and Derived1,2 to apply operations on supplied types without a casts. Something like this:

class MyClass : IMyClass
{}

class MySpecific1 : Derived1<MyClass, MySpecific2>
{
    // use inherited properties and methods of type MyClass here
    // use properties of MySpecific2 returning MyClass without casts
}

class MySpecific2 : Derived2<MyClass, MySpecific1>
{
    // use inherited properties and methods of type MyClass here
    // use properties of MySpecific1 returning MyClass without casts
}

Probably this can be solved more elegantly with variance in .net4 but I’m stuck with 3.5 for now.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T12:05:49+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 12:05 pm
    class Derived2<T, U>: Base2<T, U>
            where T: IMyClass
            where U: IMyDerived1, IBase1<T>
        {
        } 
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 428k
  • Answers 428k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The teacher gave a HUGE hint by limiting the alphabet… May 15, 2026 at 1:23 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer JSF 2.0 has built-in support for Ajax using the f:ajax… May 15, 2026 at 1:23 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I would definitely go for option 2, try to figure… May 15, 2026 at 1:23 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.